Peron was an opportunist and Salazar is lukewarm and destroyed his country by holding onto his colonies.

i didn't expect you to answer any way in particular lmao

No communism failed because it murdered its most creative and intellegent

Portuguese people hate Salazar because of the final years.

Destroyed the spirit and dynamism of its own country

Communism does to its own failures

Such a travesty

There's not the same residual nostalgia for Salazar as there is for Mussolini in Italy.

Not the bomb

Because Salazar was a retard.

and mussolini wasn't? 🤔 🤔 🤔

> Senator made his horse senator

I elect my pet tumor to rule Hispania

Mussolini was dragged into WWII and his country was too weak for him to make anything out of the situation.

Italy was weak before Mussolini for sure.

Italy's weakness was a major part of fascist rhetoric.

Fascism can be an effective agent of change, but its not a stable style of government. Totalitarianism usually failed by internal forces

"Internal"

You mean CIA operatives

The Saudi state exists

Because they cooperate

Cia operatives dont succeed in countries with true stability

Lmao

Name one country with true stability

China

cuba, they never managed to get castro 😎

Cia isnt going to do anything against china

China is a totalitarian state too

China is good for the chinese

I do wish we had a country like it in the west

Fascism would eclipse the CCP

Traditionalism imo is the only appropriate goal of fascism, or any country for that matter

Thats typically the opposite outcome of democracy, of course

Equality is a foolish goal for society

And thats the goal of most systems today

Thats even more nebulous than equality

You know what i never thought about it but the public image of fascism is kinda vague

Whose benefit? Thats an organizational style, not a goal

@Deleted User the middle ages weren't dark

Is what I was saying

Fascism is class cooperation within a hierarchy

Abolishing classes is equality