I say this as a NatSoc

Mussolini was mediocre

Fascism short lived didnt achieve any serious goals

Why was it short lived

Too masculine

>lmao your society can't even function when we bomb your cities to dust

DISCREDITED

Monarchism is the more stable variety of traditionalism

@Jay1532 no

Fascism died by the bomb

Not by the mind or institutions

could you not use that same argument for communism

Yeah Moscow was dust in 1989

if the only reason it failed was because it was constantly opposed and worked against by western powers

Peron was an opportunist and Salazar is lukewarm and destroyed his country by holding onto his colonies.

i didn't expect you to answer any way in particular lmao

No communism failed because it murdered its most creative and intellegent

Portuguese people hate Salazar because of the final years.

Destroyed the spirit and dynamism of its own country

Communism does to its own failures

Such a travesty

There's not the same residual nostalgia for Salazar as there is for Mussolini in Italy.

Not the bomb

Because Salazar was a retard.

and mussolini wasn't? 🤔 🤔 🤔

> Senator made his horse senator

I elect my pet tumor to rule Hispania

Mussolini was dragged into WWII and his country was too weak for him to make anything out of the situation.

Italy was weak before Mussolini for sure.

Italy's weakness was a major part of fascist rhetoric.

Fascism can be an effective agent of change, but its not a stable style of government. Totalitarianism usually failed by internal forces

"Internal"

You mean CIA operatives

The Saudi state exists

Because they cooperate

Cia operatives dont succeed in countries with true stability

Lmao

Name one country with true stability

China

cuba, they never managed to get castro 😎

Cia isnt going to do anything against china

China is a totalitarian state too