Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 504347178677043200
đ€
This is why Cuck Philosophy says equality but then makes it about absolute equality. Because it is clear from Marx's writings that he was more egalitarian than most people at that time
I feel like this is a bastardization of the term in order to fit Marx into it, more than a genuine investigation into the issue
communism theory is just a cover up to get people to help them out with revolutions so they can set up genocidal dictatorships
which has been the case 99% of the time
Lol, it is strange you'd say that because if you read Marxist Literature, you see hundreds of mention of equality. So, if this was a bastardization, why were Marxists so quiet about it for years until egalitarianism became unpopular
only thing commies spit out is theory and "what could be"
Hm? I have never said that using equality as a political slogan was bad, and to be honest I think the SJW types have made the idea of equality very popular. I was just trying to explain the Marxist position in an honest and open manner, not debate what "egalitarian" means
And what I am trying to tell you is that Marxism is about equality. This is necessary because that is what makes it different from Right. You asked what Right is. Didn't you?
_A number of other passages in Capital illustrate that Marx held a much more nuanced view of the position of women in the workforce than most feminists acknowledge. For example, as women entered the workforce, he writes, they potentially gained power in their private lives since they now contributed monetarily to the familyâs welfare, and were no longer under the direct control of their husbands or fathers for a large portion of the day. This had a significant effect on the family. Here, Marx shows both sides of this development. On one hand, long hours and night-work tended to undermine traditional family structures, as women were to a certain extent âmasculinizedâ by their work and were often unable to care for their children to the same extent that they had been able to do in the past. On the other, in a later passage, Marx notes that this seeming âdeterioration of characterâ led in the opposite directionâtowards âa higher form of the familyâ in which women would be the true equals of men._
This is another passage wherein Marx applauds women becoming men as a net positive
jews have outdone themselfs with communim, i dont think any man ever could come up with anything worse
So, Marx believed that masculinized women are net positive
Which even Sargon and other "Egalitarians" do not believe
sargon the youtube fag ?
I don't understand how entering the work force changes what gametes your body produces
Since a woman is an adult human female, females being he biological sex which produces eggs from their ovum
are you a feminist ?
lol.
Sure, why not
So, why are we arguing this? You are egalitarian Marxist
Oh the point of feminism is not equality either Cathrine MacKinnon said as much
i know what the point of feminism is
Like wise in the "The Dialectic of Sex" by Shulamith Firestone the purpose is to end sex distinction
Free stuff?
đ©
to destroy family values and morale and create a bunch of degenerate non binary braindead whores
lol
Feminism, in minds of most of its proponents and by definition is egalitarian
Oh I disagree with "non binary" and all that genderist nonsense
feminism is also jewish
What you and others are doing is just changing definitions
Feminism isn't a monolith, thankfully
forgot to mention the most important thing
jews are behind feminsm
đ
Lol, nothing is a monolith
But does its definition mentions equality?
Well there are Jews and billionaires funding transactivism
no shit