If equality in some respects is a result form communism, so be it, but it'll be just that, a side effect

This is what a standard egalitarian believes. I have never seen an egalitarian say that different wealth is against equality.
The difference is that a normal egalitarian still believes that boss is boss, while a Marxists even denies the difference there. So, he is more egalitarian than egalitarian

🤔

This is why Cuck Philosophy says equality but then makes it about absolute equality. Because it is clear from Marx's writings that he was more egalitarian than most people at that time

I feel like this is a bastardization of the term in order to fit Marx into it, more than a genuine investigation into the issue

communism theory is just a cover up to get people to help them out with revolutions so they can set up genocidal dictatorships

which has been the case 99% of the time

Lol, it is strange you'd say that because if you read Marxist Literature, you see hundreds of mention of equality. So, if this was a bastardization, why were Marxists so quiet about it for years until egalitarianism became unpopular

only thing commies spit out is theory and "what could be"

Hm? I have never said that using equality as a political slogan was bad, and to be honest I think the SJW types have made the idea of equality very popular. I was just trying to explain the Marxist position in an honest and open manner, not debate what "egalitarian" means

And what I am trying to tell you is that Marxism is about equality. This is necessary because that is what makes it different from Right. You asked what Right is. Didn't you?

_A number of other passages in Capital illustrate that Marx held a much more nuanced view of the position of women in the workforce than most feminists acknowledge. For example, as women entered the workforce, he writes, they potentially gained power in their private lives since they now contributed monetarily to the family’s welfare, and were no longer under the direct control of their husbands or fathers for a large portion of the day. This had a significant effect on the family. Here, Marx shows both sides of this development. On one hand, long hours and night-work tended to undermine traditional family structures, as women were to a certain extent “masculinized” by their work and were often unable to care for their children to the same extent that they had been able to do in the past. On the other, in a later passage, Marx notes that this seeming “deterioration of character” led in the opposite direction—towards “a higher form of the family” in which women would be the true equals of men._

This is another passage wherein Marx applauds women becoming men as a net positive

jews have outdone themselfs with communim, i dont think any man ever could come up with anything worse

So, Marx believed that masculinized women are net positive

Which even Sargon and other "Egalitarians" do not believe

sargon the youtube fag ?

I don't understand how entering the work force changes what gametes your body produces

Since a woman is an adult human female, females being he biological sex which produces eggs from their ovum

are you a feminist ?

lol.

Sure, why not

are you the type of guy who would send women to front lines and to unclog the sewer ? 🤔

So, why are we arguing this? You are egalitarian Marxist

Oh the point of feminism is not equality either Cathrine MacKinnon said as much

i know what the point of feminism is

Like wise in the "The Dialectic of Sex" by Shulamith Firestone the purpose is to end sex distinction

Free stuff?

😩

to destroy family values and morale and create a bunch of degenerate non binary braindead whores

lol

Feminism, in minds of most of its proponents and by definition is egalitarian

Oh I disagree with "non binary" and all that genderist nonsense

feminism is also jewish

What you and others are doing is just changing definitions

Feminism isn't a monolith, thankfully

forgot to mention the most important thing

jews are behind feminsm

😄

Lol, nothing is a monolith

But does its definition mentions equality?