commies and their theories

......

Lol

```So that just as to assure elimination of economic classes requires the revolt of the underclass (the proletariat) and, in a temporary dictatorship, their seizure of the means of production, so to assure the elimination of sexual classes requires the revolt of the underclass (women) and the seizure of control of reproduction: not only the full restoration to women of ownership of their own bodies, but also their (temporary) seizure of control of human fertility—the new population biology as well as all the social institutions of childbearing and childrearing. And just as the end goal of socialist revolution was not only the elimination of the economic class privilege but of the economic class distinction itself, so the end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of .the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between '' human beings would no longer matter culturally. (A reversion to an unobstructed pansexuality—Freud’s “polymorphous perversity”—would probably supersede hetero/ homo/bi-sexuality.) The reproduction of the species by one sex for the benefit of both would be replaced by (at least the option of) artificial reproduction: children would be bora to both sexes equally, or independently of either, however one chooses to look at it; the dependence of the child on the mother (and vice versa) would give way to a greatly shortened dependence on a small group of others in general, and any remaining inferiority to adults in physical strength would be compensated for culturally. The division of labor would be ended by the elimination of labor altogether (cybernation). The tyranny of the biological family would be broken.```

oh thats so fluffy and wonderfull

i love theories

From "The Dialectic of Sex: the Case for Feminist Revolution" by Shulamith Firestone

OH WOW

SHULAMITH IS A JEW

So, you are giving me a quote from one author to say that feminism is not what it is defined to be?

what a surprise

a jew

Well this is Radical Feminism

Which is different from Liberal Feminism

enigmatic where are you from and whats your ethnicity ?

If I said I was Aryan would you believe me?

no

im just asking

can you give me a simple answer

I'm kidding anyways, I'm a Gaul

wtf is that

French and Celtic

Well, I don't think so that we can talk anything meaningful if you will prop out a custom made definition as a rebuttal.

if you support feminism you support your own demise

Anyways Draco, I'm sorry you feel like I was just posting stuff to shift the goal posts, I genuinely was just presenting my position as an ally to radical feminism

something thats radical shows its true colors

Which I support due to it's relationship to Marxism

>european
>support stuff thats specifically anti white and anti european

is that stockholm syndrome 🤔

Lol, the point is simply this, which you seem to ignore. If what you are saying is actually right, why didn't Marxists critique it for so long?
Well, Cuck Philosophy gave the answer himself. It is because that even promoted this form of equality, at least as a slogan

Yeah, I also say this. Equality makes a nice slogan

The point is you are literally absolving Marxists of being what you think was anti Marxist behaviour all along

So, Marxists cannot be trusted?

Seems like you're trying to find ways to call us disengenuous more than you are trying to meet me where I'm at

Which is uncool bro

Like I was having a normal conversation

I cannot fathom that. You said that equality is not a goal for Marxists. But then say that they pushed it as a slogan. That is not disingenuous?

You said it yourself, equality in some respect will be a result of Marxism

you cant exactly have a normal conversation with someone who unironically believes all this and doesnt see behind the curtains

and refuses to see all the results this has produced, which is mass death for communism and retarded bitches for feminism

Er, of communism