Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 504348719588704266
But does its definition mentions equality?
Well there are Jews and billionaires funding transactivism
no shit
Which I don't support
egalitarianism is a joke to make subhumans feel better about themselves
next up is pedophilia
👍🏻
Feminism is a range of political movements, ideologies, and social movements that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve political, economic, personal, and social equality of sexes
equality is a false god
and can never be achieved
That's a nice thing, but it's not a reflection of theory
Here
commies and their theories
......
Lol
```So that just as to assure elimination of economic classes requires the revolt of the underclass (the proletariat) and, in a temporary dictatorship, their seizure of the means of production, so to assure the elimination of sexual classes requires the revolt of the underclass (women) and the seizure of control of reproduction: not only the full restoration to women of ownership of their own bodies, but also their (temporary) seizure of control of human fertility—the new population biology as well as all the social institutions of childbearing and childrearing. And just as the end goal of socialist revolution was not only the elimination of the economic class privilege but of the economic class distinction itself, so the end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of .the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between '' human beings would no longer matter culturally. (A reversion to an unobstructed pansexuality—Freud’s “polymorphous perversity”—would probably supersede hetero/ homo/bi-sexuality.) The reproduction of the species by one sex for the benefit of both would be replaced by (at least the option of) artificial reproduction: children would be bora to both sexes equally, or independently of either, however one chooses to look at it; the dependence of the child on the mother (and vice versa) would give way to a greatly shortened dependence on a small group of others in general, and any remaining inferiority to adults in physical strength would be compensated for culturally. The division of labor would be ended by the elimination of labor altogether (cybernation). The tyranny of the biological family would be broken.```
oh thats so fluffy and wonderfull
i love theories
From "The Dialectic of Sex: the Case for Feminist Revolution" by Shulamith Firestone
OH WOW
So, you are giving me a quote from one author to say that feminism is not what it is defined to be?
what a surprise
a jew
Well this is Radical Feminism
Which is different from Liberal Feminism
enigmatic where are you from and whats your ethnicity ?
If I said I was Aryan would you believe me?
no
im just asking
can you give me a simple answer
I'm kidding anyways, I'm a Gaul
wtf is that
French and Celtic
Well, I don't think so that we can talk anything meaningful if you will prop out a custom made definition as a rebuttal.
if you support feminism you support your own demise
Anyways Draco, I'm sorry you feel like I was just posting stuff to shift the goal posts, I genuinely was just presenting my position as an ally to radical feminism
something thats radical shows its true colors
Which I support due to it's relationship to Marxism
>european
>support stuff thats specifically anti white and anti european
is that stockholm syndrome 🤔