Liberals believe that immigration is a good thing because we are all descendants of immigrants, and immigration is what this country was founded on. Immigrants bring many talents and good workers to this country.

Liberals believe that the people of the USA have the right to live without fear of constant gun violence and mass shootings. Liberals are for common sense regulation of guns like most other civilized non third world countries have.

Liberals are for fair elections and everyone being equally allowed to vote without hinderance.

Liberals are AGAINST the death penalty.

Liberals are AGAINST facism, authoritarianism, and hate groups.

Do I sound like a liberal?

wow

why do everyone hates them

@Doppop liberalism is just another means of bourgeois democracy

these intersecrionary divides ultimately still advocate for capitalism and result in the working class being divided

Personally, I oppose the liberal beliefs on the matters of immigration, emigration and about the LGTB rights.

I don't think that immigration is good.

Nor emigration is.

And I want the LGTB to get vanished

And that is not going to be succeeded by giving them more rights and emphasizing their presence in the community.

The only thing we achieve by doing this, is, creating more gays.

Since only retards believe that you're born with a specific sexuality.

The community defines it.

I would say immigration is not too bad

you can't rely on your own population too much, sometimes you need talented foreigners to help

*Not when these foreigners are Syrian refugees*

Immigration is good in small doses

@Pingu Could I please have the nordic and celtic roles?

@Koninos note there is a difference between refugee and immigrant

I know

Just kidding

I don’t have perms for shit @Cairû

lol

what roles are there

the issue is that those "liberal things" arent taken to any logical norm, they tend to really be radical in those quests, and often the idea of helping the people means bringing everyone down. Liberals rather than creating an economy or model that works would rather tear everyone down to the same level with those points listed. the idea of "not gredy politicians" really doesnt pan out in 99% of liberal cases.

generally the idea of helping the poor etc. isnt just helping the poor its literally based on raising htem out of poverty with no effort from themselves.

i mean the liberals always subscribe to this weird idea of "a vitctim of a thousand faces" that has no hand in his own misery

do any of the bots work for adding roles

and that its always someone above him or some other circumstance holding him back, and that to not raise him up is to destroy his value as a human :/

the big one to me is liberals thinking that everyone should get the same level of involvement and participation and say-so, I think we need to find a way to be more meritocratic

if your IQ is below a certain threshold you shouldn't get to vote would be a good one to add

Id say thats a bit too eugenic and direct rather a better thing would be to force peoples involvement in the vote

mandatory sign up for draft for all men and civil service for all women

if you do not attend this

you cannot vote

yeah that's a bit more elegant

the reason being that you owe your service to the country of your origin, you also then have an incentive to know what the fuck is going on. Hell the army wont accept anyone under 80IQ anyways

and itll cut out subversives as well, and add that incentive of really thinking twice before you elect osmeone that might say trigger war or something similar

How to self-assign ethnic roles?