wrong

false

you are wrong

modes of production are distinct

you fuckin retard

you fucking fool!

not an argument

You can't keep repeating false shit

that won't make you right once you say it enough

You both have presented no arguments, really, just repeating one thing again and again
-It is fully Capitalist
-No
-It is fully capitalist
-No
-it is fully Capitalist
-No

Just debate properly.

no

chutup

okay i'll chutup

fuck the shut your hell the up

Modes of production are distinct and dominate the economic unit of society

nope

The base creates the superstructure and the superstructure perpetuates the base

Material analyses renders your "haha I deem this 50% capitalist" ideas false

National Socialism (Nazism) is a political belief created by Friedrich Naumann. It aims to unite Socialist ideas with nationalism (specifically German nationalism). National Socialism is a centrist idea which leans slightly right due to it's ultra-nationalist elements.

There are elements of Socialism within Nazism but in many cases welfare money was only given to those of native descent. The belief of the people being a master race is also a right wing idea and in the case of Nazi Germany the Aryan race is the master race. Nationalism is strong in Nazi regimes. The love of one's country and the belief that it should be strong is also a typically right wing idea (Note that Patriots and Nationalist are very different people and should NOT be confused).

National Socialism does not believe in class division. They despise the idea of Poor vs Rich (Communism) and Rich vs Poor (Capitalism). Many National Socialists believe that all class division should be abandoned and all people should unite behind the master race to make the Country better.
"National Socialism is Socialist". "No it's actually Nationalist with a few socialist ideas"

Communism is not poor vs rich

yes it is

No it's not

ooga booga wealthy man bad

^

Marx's critique of the gotha program points out that some will always be richer due to the virtue of laboring more and the value of labor being inherently more

But there comes a point when they are too rich

I was typing that

when they have worked too hard

^

then it's bad because muh inequality

^

thats not doctrinal to marxism at all

when you're referring to communism, byu the way, you must specify if you're talking about Marxism, Leninism or Stalinism

Communism has many forms

Leninism is a branch of marxism

stalinism is Marxist-Leninism

There are obviously differences between them

that's why they got different names

There are not differences in the end goal of Communism

and minor differences in ideology between Lenin and Stalin