fool

i didn't say that you said it was socialistic

i am diatribing the essence of your argument - you can fragment the dominant mode of production arbitrarily when you want to

you cannot

i like how you deleted the message that was copy pasted

go to school

You're just throwing away random capitalist-like actions that Hitler did, but you can't even understand that a whole system and ideology isn't based on a few capitalist actions that Hitler did.

um

National Socialism did not believe in class division

therefore not entirely capitalist.

the crux of my argument was not based on hitler privatizing anything

but the distinct mode of production

and class collaboration is literally capitalistic

to stop class consciousness

it was divised by a german kaiser to stop socialist ideas spreading

wait there

I didn't talk about class collaboration

Capitalism believes in class division, National Socialism doesn't

Therefore, not entirely capitalist

what

class division is a socialist idea

I don't need to prove, furthermore, that N.S. is not completely capitalist

capitalism claims that conventional economies dont rely on class distinctions

collaboration is a species of capitalist prevarication to stop socialist ideas

but classes do exist, and they are also divided

in the vast majority of the capitalist systems, if not all.

they do, thanks for noticing

class antagonisms are a marxist analysis

however collaborationism was ideology to placate capitalists from getting hanged and killed

especially since socialist revolutions were tried in germany

and put down by the social democratic freikorps

indeed

but

Class collaboration is capitalist camofluage

it inspires the worker to not get mad at their divisions

that are everything

its a veil over the eyes

Nazis had a left wing economic policy.

nope

have you realised that you're talking about class collaboration, while I'm talking about class divide

In capitalism, again, the classes are divided, while in N.S., they aren't