Message from @Bogatyr Bogumir
Discord ID: 517011832439963673
he also tends to vanish and no one knows where he goes
He'll email you "kept you waiting huh" and burst into your house
i wouldnt be suprised if the agency he works with essentially uses him as an agent of some sorts. He was getting close to one of the top cybersecurity firms in the US
lol,
Big dreams, hopes he goes far
CIA at his back, kidnap my ass for being politically incorrect.
Jeez
I never sucekd at anything lmao
I love science equally
i sucked the most at maths to now be one of the best at maths Xd
Maths are fun though, dont get too much annoyed at first
you just need good teachers and materials lel
public education in here is fucking crap
Maths is great, I think.
👀
🔥 🇹🇷
xD
how do you create such cucks and stupid feminists
@Deleted User died
Generally on the topic of feminism, it seeks to create the ultimate patriarchy and lusts for absolute repression from the side of men. Womens nature is emtional and chaotic and is based around values, emotion and nurturing. Men on the other hand are physical, creative in that they must build something and create it, and based around values. Both sexes generally orbit around the same values. However men always are around the outer orbit and they take a women and structure her world. They add barriers and guarantee her safety and also demand things from her. A certain specific role and expect to be corrected should they acidentlally flow to break the barrier, into obvious danger. This is the issue of emotional thinking 99% of women will admit to this being an issue for them. (anyone who has been with a woman for longer than 2 years will also notice this).
As such women demand a certain patriarchy becuase women are fundumentally based on one drive, caring for the hom and the children and raising them. Should a man fail to provide a structured and safe enviorment for her to live this way she will simply search for another man. If she cannto spend time at home with the kids the same thing happens. This is because this is part of her immutable identity as a woman. This is why men must create and build, and ventur einto the unkown, to bring food to the table, and know the world such that when the kids get old enough that they can with confidence lead them into the world. It also demands masculine strength, that is stereotypical.
holy fuck, link me your quote repo
feminists had good points, HAD, most of modern "feminists" are just outcast, dumb brainlet trash
they think that they should be treated better than everyone else, the opposite of what feminists wanted
SO how does feminism actually go towards this? Basically imagine the most stereotypical macho man and then imagine that pressed onto the state. They get rid of particular men and use the most powerful macho man, the state, to repress other men that may want to court them or in fact marry them.
They literally drive for islamic levels of repression, hence hteir support for mass censorship and even punishing men physically for LOOKING at women. Literally they want a man so powerful that he attacks other men for looking at her wrong and beats them into the ground A woman with such a man is literally a queen among peasant girls.
She is safe in forming a family, going about her life while in constant contact with the kids, and has a safe enviorment to raom around in.
And nah man, all feminism was always bad
1st wave as well, who were literal terrorists
Generally now I support patriarchy, the non absurd type that feminists posit
the general type, which will give both sexes literally what they actually desire
not all women are the same
I find most of them to be blunt(brainlets) as fuck
so it might match a lot of them, sure
@Bogatyr Bogumir Feminists were always bad.
Not always
It wasnt healthy to have a woman be traded as a product for marriage for example
It doesnt seem much humane or even rational to do that
Yes, always.
what always
Patriarchy doesnt necessitate that, rather it can work with egalitarianism to an extent