>which was what was in effect

He planned to help the workers

No

he didnt

Yes

There is no evidence to suggest that

Except he did

“Its leader was Robert Ley, who stated that its aim was 'to create a true social and productive community'.[1] Theoretically, DAF existed to act as a medium through which workers and owners could mutually represent their interests. Wages were set by the 12 DAF trustees. The employees were given relatively high set wages and security of employment, and dismissal was increasingly made difficult. Social security and leisure programmes were started, canteens, breaks, and regular working times were established, and German workers were generally satisfied by what the DAF gave them in repayment for their absolute loyalty.”

It was a show of force over the workers to keep them in check

^

muchlike KDF

Except they gave them higher wages

except KDF was bread and circuses the organization

Harder to fire

Where is that quote even from

Social security

>social security is socialism

Yes

LOL

what the fuck

Of course it is

Socialist policy

lemaoe

Welfare is literally a socialist policy

This argument is going round in circles

You haven’t the slightest idea of socialism, that’s evident from your two examples of Venezuela and fucking Nazi Germany

Not my fault you can’t accept the economy had strong state intervention , privatisation and private property was only in name and was at the direction of the state

Yes I do

lol

I schooled that demokratica guy earlier on it

I have bigger arguments on my pc

Currently on phone so

You claim social policies aimed to appease workers makes up for the total industrial privatisation

welfare is not socialism
because it does not impact the means of production in any way

which is the only thing that matters

the privatisation which was only in name

Since the state over controlled it

the control over the means of production

welfare is socialist