Message from @Doctor Anon
Discord ID: 520696778153132053
Russia is basically a turtle from what I know, its tanks arent that far behind actually. Ships well it depends. Its aircraft well depending on the doctrine. Guns this is a field id actually give to russia, talking about all the guns infantry can have, they relaly do have a LOT of variety and there is this one beastly gun
its like 14mm or something else thats absurd
a US vs Russia war, if russia is defending would just be an eternal stalemate until nukes were used
also as far as gun laws go
for you guys your countries
is it illegal for private citizens to manufacture firearms, and if not manufacture, design them? Or las concerning ownership
POLAND:
Illegal to manufacture, illegal to own.
Ownership is based on being given permission from your local police chief. You can have collectioners rights or sports rights. To maintain sports rights you need to participate constantly in competition otherwise you lose your permit. Collectioners is much better. However its also harder to get. None of what you own is guaranteed + stupid expensive ammo. And stupid expensive guns, and a lot of money to put into actually getting the papers. Wait time is 1 year.
If it comes to it the state can literally juts, or the police rather can, just simply take your gun.
As far as without permit goes its blackpowder guns made and designed before I think 1895, with seperate loading and single shot. So we load the powder, primer and bullet seperately. The gun must be blockpowder powered.
Where's the nsfw channel
will only accept NSFW if I can post surgery shit there, and I mean legit educational stuff
albeit bloody
teach you bros some medicine
so when WW3 hits you know what to do
Tanks are quite far behind
it was shown when western and soviet tanks met
Ships are still horrible cold war era tech and the the ships themselves aren't to the standards of the west
the aircrafts aren't close
Guns defo go to the west, the AK is not as good as the M
Variety isn't always a good thing
as in it doesn't mean its good
I wanna post nsfw
Only gay nigger Jews don't like nsfw okay liberal @Doctor Anon
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ#1456 I mean looking at soviet era and thinking modenr russian tanks are the same thing is just not true. Also the AK system is IMo better, because of what war demands mass prduction and ease of use. The variety im talking about is extra systems such as infantry support guns, or stationary guns the russians have some absurdly overpowered designs that just dwarf the US varients. Thing is they are meant to be defensive.
It generally depends the more I read, posts from vets of wars they describe the guns essentially as equal but very different. They make you fall in love with them but for different reasons.
f. Many cases of a stuck or jammed selector lever were
reported.
It was not possible to correlate the kind of lubricant or method of
lubrication with malfunctions, not was such correlation possible
with ammunition of a particular type or make.
military report of the m14
also so why did AR's ue to jam why do they outpreform AK's now
because the older versions were not wha they are today, the tolerances were constantly tightened for example it explains both vietnam and afghanistan jams
they have various complex structures such as gas valves and all
this is vietnam war era
he was arguing that m14 was surperiour to ak
currently an AR only has to worry about duse getting into the trigger assembly. And dust getting into th gun as it cycles and in dusty enviorments this will happen. Hence why using heavy lube is recommended now
in teh vietnam era I would disagree, the idea was simply not developed enough at the time to be superior it took the AR some 30 years to essentially catch up, but the catching up it did built so much momentum that currently it supercedes the AK
but that is the old designs we have yet to see russias new design
ALSO turns out, the 5.56 is effective, and will cause MORE damage than the 7.62. HOWEVER this is dependant on barell length that the M platform originally had
when it became a carbine it simply became too weak, the reduced stoppage power was noted
Also fun fact in vietnam the AK's actually had more stoppage power and volume of fire than the Ar platform rifles,
so which rifle preformed better in the beggining as far as war and combatants -> AK,
After time? -> AR
Currently both rifles are apples to oranges this post literally sums it up
It's kinda a given though the M-16 used a 5.56 while the AK platforms used the larger 7.62
Personally I have experience with both platforms they are both pretty good but I prefer the AK platform because of how easy it is to use.