Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 522499206007619585
it's not about bargining
Employees would have to pay them a good amount to keep them
if they were needed lol
you can replace the woman that is cleaning corridors at your office in no time
we're not talking about IT guys that are very valueable on the market
and can very easily know their worth
i can see you are a very liberal guy so i guess i should also point out my liberal ideas on the market
low taxation is good
creating an enviroment where capital can be invested to create jobs is ideal
people should have acess to a variety of choices of their prefered services
etc etc
idk this is just standard stuff
lol
"you can replace the woman that is cleaning corridors at your office in no time
"
Yes there would be competition in the labour market
and employees would have to pay well
do you think there are more business looking for people to clean their offices than people looking for that sort of job?
because that would be the only way that the employee would have less to lose than the employer
Yes
lol
theres more job openings than job less
wages are rising and will rise more than ever
because employers compete for labour too
but surely in the US a lot of people are constrained to their immediate area for job opportunities, since lot of people cant afford a car
and public transportation in the US i heard is kinda shitty
dude 90% of households owna car
and buses are easy to take
same with metro
And that isn't a problem since most of these jobs are local
idk these issues differ from state to state, some are easier to invest and create business than others
and there are many variables
of course
as a government, let's say a state government, you need a profound knowledge and many studies to be able to determine if more deregulation would lead to more investment, and if the trade off of less workers right for more finantial freedom would be justified
like if the trade off was something like a range of 2-5% more investment but in turn you cut minimum wage by $500 like why would you do that?
in some cases that would just be the equivalent of 2-3 new jobs, and everyone on the minimum wage would be worse off
you gotta balance it out
if you ordered an independent study that told you that investment would stay constant even if you added a labour law to protect workers i'd say thats a good trade off. no harm no foul
"you cut minimum wage by $500 like why would you do that?"
You would probably allow the employees to be paid more
since they save on money