maybe

Wanna debate

about?

You choose

I am literally

the ben shapiro of debates

Here is one: Facism isn't a bad system, it is actually a very good system in, for example an economic crisis

Why?

Fascism, is a 1 party dictatorship, give a good party with bright minds power

Fascist are against democracy, which in my opinion

Is so dumb

Or at least in its current system

In a 14 country survey, 74% said that they are not interested or understand politics

and we literally give them the power to choose the leader of a country

Tag some people, this is boring af

Fascism incorporates corporatism and based on how corporatism is implemented it could lead to the micromanaging of the economy causing a failure.

Give the groups a leader, who all are part of the current system, like ministers

and the problems all go away

We can look at Franco's Spain and see how their economic micromanaging produced failure. It's only until the 1960's where his new bureaucrats took a more hands off stance that the economy improved.

@Daphene Fascism does not need to incorporate corporatism, and Franco was neither Fascist, nor his policies corporatist

The policies that helped Spain to flourish during that time were the FET policies which stem from the Falangist party before it

Nationalised unions did most of the work there

If you subcribe to Fascism as a worldview then the Falangists were definitely Fascist

@everyone https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/06/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-arrested-sex-trafficking.html

@Daphene https://local.theonion.com/priest-regrets-vow-of-celibacy-after-learning-about-fur-1823326934/amp

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/tulsi2020?refcode=web-select-menu

ew

some unknown samoan lady

https://youtu.be/0vh0AklSXkU

```

"There is no debate over what happened," Edwards told VICE news.

"I served Mr. Trump with a subpoena for deposition in 2009. He talked to me voluntarily, and consequently we withdrew the subpoena in light of his voluntarily providing information…. I can't imagine there being any dispute of any of this.

"Edwards also said that it is "obvious" Trump himself was not involved in any of Epstein's illicit activity.....

Edwards, the lawyer for Roberts and about 10 other Jane Does, said that after he served Trump with the subpoena in 2009, Trump immediately contacted him."

During the conversation, Mr. Trump was open and forthright," Edwards said.

"I cannot discuss the substance of the conversation. But I will say that it was obvious to me that he was in no way involved in any untoward activity."

It appears that Trump cut ties to Epstein a few weeks after the non-prosecution agreement was reached. On October 15, 2007, the New York Post reported that Mar-A-Lago had barred Epstein because he hit on a masseuse at the club. Epstein denied to the the Post that he had been banned. One of the Jane Doe attorneys told VICE News a slightly different account, saying that he had been told Trump broke ties with Epstein after Epstein tried to pick up the underage daughter of a Mar-A-Lago club member."

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/j59vm8/the-salacious-ammo-even-donald-trump-wont-use-in-a-fight-against-hillary-clinton-bill-clinton```

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=s9yD_1562490121

@Deleted User

Thanks, very cool

https://youtu.be/RrbeLKAJWys

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7219313/German-holidaymakers-accused-raping-18-year-old-tourist-Mallorca-arrive-court.html

https://twitter.com/alexsalvinews/status/1147728721383571461

https://news.sky.com/story/festival-charges-double-ticket-price-for-non-people-of-colour-11758249

Anyone done to have a debate really don’t know what I’m but I need some ideas lol always good to have a plan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvt55Pj0CHk

gday

Guns should be completely legal in the UK