~~also stalinist collectivisation was a bit too rapid and the distribution a bit too overcentralised~~

than stalin purged them which lead to them retaliating by burning the properties and migrating

the kulaks were the rich feudal land owners resisting socialism

and they had to go

but you would do that to if a few drunk soldiers were going to strip you naked, gun you down and take whats yours

dude, the kulaks were peasants

they were literally peasants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakh_famine_of_1932%E2%80%9333

same happened Kazakhstan

no they exploited peasant labor

and many attest to the unfair and ethnic based persecution and distribution of food

no they literally werent

Chechenya should get country or start new war with ruskies, i voluntare to fight Ruskies.

this is revisionist history

<:merchant:474560786522701833>

In May 1929, the Sovnarkom issued a decree that formalised the notion of "kulak household" (кулацкое хозяйство). Any of the following defined a kulak:[4][14]

Use of hired labor.
Ownership of a mill, a creamery (маслобойня, "butter-making rig"), other processing equipment, or a complex machine with a motor.
Systematic renting out of agricultural equipment or facilities.
Involvement in trade, money-lending, commercial brokerage, or "other sources of non-labor income".

Yes, peasants just like they would be considered in the tird reich on in italy or as farmers in united states

<:merchant:474560786522701833> good ruski dead ruski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

"During the Russian revolution, the label of kulak was used as an epithet for any peasant who resisted handing over his grain to requisitions from the Bolshevik government.[2] During 1929–1933, Joseph Stalin's all-out campaign to collectivize the peasantry meant that "peasants with a couple of cows or five or six acres more than their neighbors" were labeled kulaks.[3"

there is nothing to suggest holodomor was intentional

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak

THE SOURCE GIVEN FOR THAT IS LITERALLY ROBERT CONQUEST

BAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAA

dude if the bread basket is in ukrain but the food is being delivered to urbanized russians and the ukrainians access to the native production is cut off than thats just genocide

exactly what Church Hill did in india

there was a poor harvest and grain rust

and other areas were affected

man made famines were the people closest to production are cut off from it is genocide

if it was just poor harvest than the ukrainian shouldve been less affected than the russians

since the food was still produced in ukrain

but the vice versa occured

ukrainians were cut off from their native production

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Famine_en_URSS_1933.jpg
not just ukraine

and they product of the product was reallocated to russians

no shit

youre not paying attention

or youre ignoring what said

Ukrain was a bread basket

Ukrainians could easily support themselves in food production

ok so perhaps the grain distribution was flawed