Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 634313881598164992
<:merchant:474560786522701833>
In May 1929, the Sovnarkom issued a decree that formalised the notion of "kulak household" (кулацкое хозяйство). Any of the following defined a kulak:[4][14]
Use of hired labor.
Ownership of a mill, a creamery (маслобойня, "butter-making rig"), other processing equipment, or a complex machine with a motor.
Systematic renting out of agricultural equipment or facilities.
Involvement in trade, money-lending, commercial brokerage, or "other sources of non-labor income".
Yes, peasants just like they would be considered in the tird reich on in italy or as farmers in united states
<:merchant:474560786522701833> good ruski dead ruski
"During the Russian revolution, the label of kulak was used as an epithet for any peasant who resisted handing over his grain to requisitions from the Bolshevik government.[2] During 1929–1933, Joseph Stalin's all-out campaign to collectivize the peasantry meant that "peasants with a couple of cows or five or six acres more than their neighbors" were labeled kulaks.[3"
there is nothing to suggest holodomor was intentional
THE SOURCE GIVEN FOR THAT IS LITERALLY ROBERT CONQUEST
BAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAA
dude if the bread basket is in ukrain but the food is being delivered to urbanized russians and the ukrainians access to the native production is cut off than thats just genocide
exactly what Church Hill did in india
there was a poor harvest and grain rust
and other areas were affected
man made famines were the people closest to production are cut off from it is genocide
if it was just poor harvest than the ukrainian shouldve been less affected than the russians
since the food was still produced in ukrain
but the vice versa occured
ukrainians were cut off from their native production
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Famine_en_URSS_1933.jpg
not just ukraine
no shit
youre not paying attention
or youre ignoring what said
Ukrain was a bread basket
Ukrainians could easily support themselves in food production
ok so perhaps the grain distribution was flawed
why didnt they?
because the product of their native production
was reallocated to russians
and turkmen
same thing occurred in Kazakhstan
and others
there was no racial aspect to this
production in Kazakhstan was reallocated
ofc there was
stalin especially hated the tatars
beria maybe
he death marched them
that was beria
under stalin