```[ Bourgeois Socialists: ]
The second category consists of adherents of present-day society who have been frightened for its future by the evils to which it necessarily gives rise. What they want, therefore, is to maintain this society while getting rid of the evils which are an inherent part of it.

To this end, some propose mere welfare measures – while others come forward with grandiose systems of reform which, under the pretense of re-organizing society, are in fact intended to preserve the foundations, and hence the life, of existing society.

Communists must unremittingly struggle against these bourgeois socialists because they work for the enemies of communists and protect the society which communists aim to overthrow.```

```[ Democratic Socialists: ]
Finally, the third category consists of democratic socialists who favor some of the same measures the communists advocate, as described in Question 18, not as part of the transition to communism, however, but as measures which they believe will be sufficient to abolish the misery and evils of present-day society.

These democratic socialists are either proletarians who are not yet sufficiently clear about the conditions of the liberation of their class, or they are representatives of the petty bourgeoisie, a class which, prior to the achievement of democracy and the socialist measures to which it gives rise, has many interests in common with the proletariat.

It follows that, in moments of action, the communists will have to come to an understanding with these democratic socialists, and in general to follow as far as possible a common policy with them – provided that these socialists do not enter into the service of the ruling bourgeoisie and attack the communists.

It is clear that this form of co-operation in action does not exclude the discussion of differences.```

>why we don't join onto 'socialist parties'

You forgot that proletarians created Fascism

right now the Labour parties tend to be bourgeoisie socialists

What are you? @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼

proletarians didn't

a fucking communist

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 is a nigger

Nice

Oh yes they did.

Mussolini was sucking conservatives dicks to get more power

That's what he is

Forgot about Yellow Socialism!

and had a policy made for businessmen

italian fascism was all about luxury

lets remember that woke italian philosophy of FUTURISM

lol

Futurist cooking plz

What about futuristic fuck machines?

That Anarcho-Communists want.

I want that

rejection of egalitarianism and promoting class collaboration

that aint really a proletarian movement

For me I agree with most things, besides the elite.

revolutionary vanguard elite 😂

lol

Though citizens should perform civic duties for their communities.

in the interest of the state*

thus in the interest of the vanguard "classless" elite

which were bourgeois

thinking you can transcend class struggle is idiocy

fascism co-opts the communist movement then pretends it's anti-capitalist: and anti communist 😂

Mussolini was a plutocrat

Fascism is the protection of capitalist interest with brutal force

the fascists are actually controlled by the jews i bet

LOL

they're just being anti-jew to disguise it

think about it