That we get along

Personnally I think it's good they're going to their proper routes and not being Basically Thatcher but lefy

Fuck redistruibting everything international @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 I'm sorry I don't believe in using a mathmatical average to put everyone on for their pay scale.

*left

Chinese bourgeois needed sovereignity hence the revolution against the emperor and the colonialists

that's why the KMT was formed

Hong Kong best

```The so-called socialists are divided into three categories.```
```[ Reactionary Socialists: ]```
```[ Bourgeois Socialists: ]```
```[ Democratic Socialists: ]```

```[ Reactionary Socialists: ]
The first category consists of adherents of a feudal and patriarchal society which has already been destroyed, and is still daily being destroyed, by big industry and world trade and their creation, bourgeois society. This category concludes, from the evils of existing society, that feudal and patriarchal society must be restored because it was free of such evils. In one way or another, all their proposals are directed to this end.````

even if it was a larger party including any chinese nationalist like communists or center left before it became fascist under Chiang Kai Shek

```[ Bourgeois Socialists: ]
The second category consists of adherents of present-day society who have been frightened for its future by the evils to which it necessarily gives rise. What they want, therefore, is to maintain this society while getting rid of the evils which are an inherent part of it.

To this end, some propose mere welfare measures – while others come forward with grandiose systems of reform which, under the pretense of re-organizing society, are in fact intended to preserve the foundations, and hence the life, of existing society.

Communists must unremittingly struggle against these bourgeois socialists because they work for the enemies of communists and protect the society which communists aim to overthrow.```

```[ Democratic Socialists: ]
Finally, the third category consists of democratic socialists who favor some of the same measures the communists advocate, as described in Question 18, not as part of the transition to communism, however, but as measures which they believe will be sufficient to abolish the misery and evils of present-day society.

These democratic socialists are either proletarians who are not yet sufficiently clear about the conditions of the liberation of their class, or they are representatives of the petty bourgeoisie, a class which, prior to the achievement of democracy and the socialist measures to which it gives rise, has many interests in common with the proletariat.

It follows that, in moments of action, the communists will have to come to an understanding with these democratic socialists, and in general to follow as far as possible a common policy with them – provided that these socialists do not enter into the service of the ruling bourgeoisie and attack the communists.

It is clear that this form of co-operation in action does not exclude the discussion of differences.```

>why we don't join onto 'socialist parties'

You forgot that proletarians created Fascism

right now the Labour parties tend to be bourgeoisie socialists

What are you? @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼

proletarians didn't

a fucking communist

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 is a nigger

Nice

Oh yes they did.

Mussolini was sucking conservatives dicks to get more power

That's what he is

Forgot about Yellow Socialism!

and had a policy made for businessmen

italian fascism was all about luxury

lets remember that woke italian philosophy of FUTURISM

lol

Futurist cooking plz

What about futuristic fuck machines?

That Anarcho-Communists want.

I want that

rejection of egalitarianism and promoting class collaboration

that aint really a proletarian movement

For me I agree with most things, besides the elite.

revolutionary vanguard elite 😂

lol

Though citizens should perform civic duties for their communities.

in the interest of the state*