No, that is not a consequence of capitalism, in NATURE you have to use your labor power in order to survive

^

it is a natural axiom

I would never try to prevent another worker from utilizing their means of survival.

^

I would

I'd kill everybody

@Deleted User with nobody to dictate the usage of "labor power," there will be no structure for society and infrastructure to function

jk

<.< Fuck you the cohersion of the state needs to be removed.

It's attacking personal life and going too socially liberal.

@karbon How can you make such a statement and expect any reasonable person to take you seriously? Did your magical crystal ball reveal that information to you?

It's going too marxist for me.

LOL

A capitalist state being too marxist

The state is ran by Marxists.

LOL

That's America for you.

Are you in China?

@QuinnTheQuartz If only..

LOL AMERICA RUN BY MARXISTS thats a good one

@Deleted User name one instance of it working in history

When half of your corporations believe and support Karl Marx's policies despite being anti-capitalist in-nature.

Looking at Goolag

Wtf

Google is marxist 🤦

Wtf

American Colleges are typically left-leaning hell holes because the communists and red socialists.

water kills martians

@QuinnTheQuartz or crowds of "whiz kids" waving around soviet flags yet saying they are not communists

@karbon How about non-capitalist societies in which one needn't sell their labor power to an employer in order to survive? Take for example a hunter-gatherer society, the kind of society in which humans lived for much of our history, and which can aptly be described as "primitive communism,".

Water burns martians.

Communism is the same way.

T_T

@QuinnTheQuartz False

@Deleted User so communism is a caveman ideology

gotcha

Communism is like Capitalist Labor, who can form the most unions can have the monolopy on resources.

shiiiiiiit cyber

👏