yes

finally, someone who understands

syndicalists want to see the world burn

ok no but MLMs sometimes reject historical materialism

they legit believe you can go from feudalism to socialism (some of them)

that’s an interesting thought

though a stupid one

feudal vassals would never agree to turn their power over to a central government

and due to the sheer number of vassals in feudal society, the king/emperor would effortlessly be overthrown

ok i should be specific

China was a feudalistic society (had lots of peasent) with capitalist elements (there was an urban population)

so they believe you can just transform *that* straight to socialism

Didn't eduard limonov suck off a dude for a hotdog?

when marx was like "SoCiALisM iS BoRN WiTh tHe bIrTHmArKS Of CapiTlaIsm."

european feudalism would be a **hell no**

tbh Hotdogs are good

not good enough to suck off a dude

idk, depends on the hotdog

That hotdog gotta be like 👌🏿

all about those feudal rights

i see feudal society not as a pyramid, but instead quite simply

“ah yes, you have your liege, a few vassals, maybe a bishop or two, and literally everybody else is a peasant”

@Perpetual Moral Imbalance history is about developing the productive forces, capitalism creates an industrial base but doesn't resolve the contradiction between the capitalist and the workers so revolution incurs. Feudalism there is not a 'capitalist' nor really 'workers' but the 'aristocracy/lords' and the 'peasantry' that's why MLM doesn't make sense when they want to take a mostly feudal country and turn it straight into socialism.

yes feudalism runs on noble vassals

so what ends up happening is that most MLMs either argue that chinese nationalist phase like 1912 to 1949 was enough 'capitalistic development'

and their assorted tiers of authority

when the communist revolution was led by peasantry and not the 'vanguard' so literally counter to what marx said

the other argument is that Mao resolved this 'feudalist' problem by implementing new-democracy

which i also disagree with because china's economy remained heavily decentralized and not really 'socialist' at the end of it

not enough c e n t r a l p l a n n i n g

Are u guys ruckas nuckas for life?

stfu chad

>Chad

lmao

>Being a Libertarian

>Having non-latin characters in your name

>Not being a Libertarian

Lmao why should i?

>being a conservative

>not conserving anything other than a shitty status quo

got em