Message from @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼
Discord ID: 451419802750156800
Duh
NAZBOL GANG???????????
I used to be nazbol too
i keep switching between MLM and nazbol
cant make up my mind
polen can into space
MLM?
marxist-leninist maoist
MLM are anarchists :dab:
yes
finally, someone who understands
syndicalists want to see the world burn
ok no but MLMs sometimes reject historical materialism
they legit believe you can go from feudalism to socialism (some of them)
that’s an interesting thought
though a stupid one
feudal vassals would never agree to turn their power over to a central government
and due to the sheer number of vassals in feudal society, the king/emperor would effortlessly be overthrown
ok i should be specific
China was a feudalistic society (had lots of peasent) with capitalist elements (there was an urban population)
Didn't eduard limonov suck off a dude for a hotdog?
when marx was like "SoCiALisM iS BoRN WiTh tHe bIrTHmArKS Of CapiTlaIsm."
european feudalism would be a **hell no**
tbh Hotdogs are good
not good enough to suck off a dude
idk, depends on the hotdog
That hotdog gotta be like 👌🏿
all about those feudal rights
i see feudal society not as a pyramid, but instead quite simply
“ah yes, you have your liege, a few vassals, maybe a bishop or two, and literally everybody else is a peasant”
@Perpetual Moral Imbalance history is about developing the productive forces, capitalism creates an industrial base but doesn't resolve the contradiction between the capitalist and the workers so revolution incurs. Feudalism there is not a 'capitalist' nor really 'workers' but the 'aristocracy/lords' and the 'peasantry' that's why MLM doesn't make sense when they want to take a mostly feudal country and turn it straight into socialism.
yes feudalism runs on noble vassals
so what ends up happening is that most MLMs either argue that chinese nationalist phase like 1912 to 1949 was enough 'capitalistic development'
and their assorted tiers of authority
when the communist revolution was led by peasantry and not the 'vanguard' so literally counter to what marx said
the other argument is that Mao resolved this 'feudalist' problem by implementing new-democracy
which i also disagree with because china's economy remained heavily decentralized and not really 'socialist' at the end of it
not enough c e n t r a l p l a n n i n g
Are u guys ruckas nuckas for life?
stfu chad