Message from @Adoring Fan
Discord ID: 451449159321518081
It is perfectly acceptable to consider countries such as Sweden or Germany as being "socialistic" without them having seized the means of production. Prussian socialism, for instance, existed prior to Marx. While, ironically, Marx would consider this system to be an embodiment of capitalism.
Yet more evidence that the eternal Marxist does nothing but subvert meanings and definitions to fit his understanding of the world, vehemently rejecting reality on a regular basis for the sake of furthering his agenda.
It is textbook post-modernism
A nation cannot exist as a whole without some form of capitalistic economic values.
right but controled capitalism > out-of-control capitalism
Out of control capitalism is unrealistic
there has never in the history of the world been either a completely free market, nor a total rule of the proletariat.
yis but im talking state controled capitalsim
the no true scotsman fallacy runs so widely within both the groups of ancaps and communists.
where the state is working in the best interests for the people
and both of them make as little sense as the other
State controlled capitalism would be ideal. With the right means.
with the right state
or the right people rather
so no jews workig against the white mans interesting for the west for example
All of which boil down to how much power and authority is trusted upon certain individuals
national socialism is the ideal
speaking of jews
because of his "On the Jewish Question"
he was from a jewish family if im not mistaken
I don’t believe socialism would be able to sustain itself without the means of globalization. While globalization is also its downfall. Socialism is a paradox
failing brilliantly to realise Marx was merely giving jews a formula on how to control the goy
@S_5_fifstee national socialism =/= marxist socialism. It was very much sustainable
^
One example of successful sustainment?
Germany
the thrid
Lol that’s the example of success?
it got far
Germany had an extremely stable economy. The argument that the economy failed because Germany lost the war is a dumbfounded one
it was those guys vs the world
Not far enough 😂
It is akin to saying the American economy would fail, if the entire world nuked it
Just because you lose a war doesn't mean the system of Government was bad...
It wasn't the system that made them lose
Germany had a pretty good economy and goof birth rate
I don’t believe it failed because Germany lost the war in its entirety. Also because a system like that can only support itself if the people are all on the same page. One change of thought from one generation to the next and it’s all over
it was only at the end of the war, when they'd been all worned out, that people in the camps started starving