I’m sorry who’s not the ones pushing internationalism? The libertarian movements?

theyre certainly non-interventionists

neocons are pushing internationalism, but not as a result of their capitalism

commies thus make the false equivalence of suggesting capitalism is the root of internationalism

do not get me wrong, a large part of capitalists **are** internationalists, globalists, et cetera. However, the vast amount of socialistic European states pushing vehemently for globalism mustn't be ignored

however a communist may try to shift the definition of socialism to fit only their understanding, socialism existed as a school of thought long before Marx, and did not mean the same as it does to them.

It is perfectly acceptable to consider countries such as Sweden or Germany as being "socialistic" without them having seized the means of production. Prussian socialism, for instance, existed prior to Marx. While, ironically, Marx would consider this system to be an embodiment of capitalism.

Yet more evidence that the eternal Marxist does nothing but subvert meanings and definitions to fit his understanding of the world, vehemently rejecting reality on a regular basis for the sake of furthering his agenda.

It is textbook post-modernism

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/450414720495910913/451447949877313537/blank-world-map-printable-scrapsofme-me-inside.jpg?width=1032&height=678 updated the map

A nation cannot exist as a whole without some form of capitalistic economic values.

right but controled capitalism > out-of-control capitalism

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/451204270101102606/451215136024428544/The_Triple_Entente.png this is better map @TubeYou

Out of control capitalism is unrealistic

there has never in the history of the world been either a completely free market, nor a total rule of the proletariat.

yis but im talking state controled capitalsim

the no true scotsman fallacy runs so widely within both the groups of ancaps and communists.

where the state is working in the best interests for the people

and both of them make as little sense as the other

State controlled capitalism would be ideal. With the right means.

with the right state

or the right people rather

so no jews workig against the white mans interesting for the west for example

All of which boil down to how much power and authority is trusted upon certain individuals

national socialism is the ideal

speaking of jews

it is amazing how communists try to suggest that marx was an anti-semite

because of his "On the Jewish Question"

he was from a jewish family if im not mistaken

I don’t believe socialism would be able to sustain itself without the means of globalization. While globalization is also its downfall. Socialism is a paradox

failing brilliantly to realise Marx was merely giving jews a formula on how to control the goy

@S_5_fifstee national socialism =/= marxist socialism. It was very much sustainable

^

One example of successful sustainment?

Germany

the thrid

Lol that’s the example of success?

it got far

Germany had an extremely stable economy. The argument that the economy failed because Germany lost the war is a dumbfounded one

it was those guys vs the world

Not far enough 😂