Aye.

But the CIA needs to stop doing fucked up experiments like it has done in the paat

considering the weapons that were being revealed in the 50's and 60's that had been created in the 30's and 40's by trials of the CIA, the CIA has the greater potential to be more dangerous than the KGB ever was

I agree but KGB Did a lot more terrible things to Soviet citizens

The FSB did more than the KGB honestly

Why I acknowledged it and stated "greater potential to be more dangerous than"\

Yes I agree the CIA has affected other countries like Cuba and has done shady things and the KGB Did not affect other countries unlike the CIA

One thing I would like to comment on, most Anarchists aren't anarchists but douchebag socialists that vote towards a stronger central government and more government handouts, most Anarchists are an oxymoron.

Yep

I mean

I don't pay much attention to Anarchist

Not really

The issue I see with them is none seem to really agree on what anarchy is

And what level of statelessness is required to be considered anarchy

For most of the outspoken ones that protest in major cities are some of the same members of Antifa and a handful of BLM

which are heavily socialist organizations

Like the Ukrainian rogue militias are a good example of anarchists

I'm referring to majority of self identified anarchists in the US

They, as a people, need something of unity. That is culture. But they fight at a very localized level. For themselves, their families and communities. They don't have much hierarchy, they are more of a brotherhood

Anarachists to have an organization is an oxymoron, haha

Yes the anarchist and communist movements in the U.S. are a clusterfuck

anarchists are retarded

I think too many ppl think Anarchists all believe in 100% no collectivism

or a "typical" hierarchy model

Besides nate here, they don't really believe that

the term "anarchy" literally means "no leader".

btw, anarchists don't have a leader, right?

I mean depends on what form you are looking at

@LoJ that means its literally a unorganized chaos

Most of the time it isn't factionless

Just a VERY minimal state or stateless

And ppl look up the google definition of anarchy and assume that is what every anarchist believes

i've seen some 5'0 asian bitch in portland saying she's a leader of anarchists in portland, and it was so hilarious to me considering that anarchists dont have a leader

Anarchy, in its essence and presented by the word itself, with its Latin root means "no leader". That would mean that everybody would have to operate on social contract because their is no enforcer or central authority/leader

Anything other than that would be properly coined as "pseudoanarchism"

The anarchy that advocates for no cultural unity, nationalism, complete statelessness, equal wealth and no factions is ludicrous

What we see in Ukraine is like just next level Libertarianism

well thats retarded

Where the state doesn't dictate anyone's lives

if thats what anarchy stands for then wtf

Then how will any public roads or infrastructure be completed if there are no tax dollars?