Message from @tsarsNeezy
Discord ID: 451768612106272768
There are anarchists that recognize this
Like I said, look at Ukraine
There will be a constant lord of the flies scenario until somebody is able to maintain power and then they die and it goes back to the LotF situation or their heir will maintain rule, there is always Order or Chaos, there is no true quantum existence of Unified versus Divided rule
ukraine is like bosnia, basically a battleground where many ethnicities are gathered in
Yeeeeep
Ukraine can't handle a nuclear reactor, let alone a successful government, what works for Ukraine doesn't work for the U.S.
@LoJ ukraine did the most retarded thing, and thats sell about 5000 nuclear shit to russia
The rogue miltias that wave the blood and soil flag of anarchy don't take orders from the Ukrainian state, the Russian separatists or even some high up in the militia. They fight in small bands thats only leadership comes from just respected individuals. They are a brotherhood. They are part of a larger movement and ideal, but they aren't organized as as movement, only united behind a common culture.
Ukraine is still under political control of Russia, they just aren't annexed
Ukraine is a great place to gain combat experience
Omfg Jabbers. NICE. Way to assume something that is 100% not my position
AAAAA LEAGUE OF JABBERS
DAS JUDEN
@NoProfit you can come to bosnia aswell, there's a riot happening in sarajevo, its capital
I am one of those people that recognizes that there is NO ideal political system for the entire world. Different cultures and people will be compatible with different systems.
Unless you change the culture.
As according to Karde you can do that.
._.
**Discuss**
I did the test
I got An-Cap
I never advocated that for the U.S., I don't even support it 100% for Ukraine, given that centralized states surrounding them can prevent it from existing
ANCAP
Eagle, I never stated what your position was
I am a Constitutionalist in the U.S.
isn't national socialism a ideal political system? i mean for one they destroy all other political parties to their people wouldnt fight one another over politics, secondly it rejects democracy, which goes against human nature, and thirdly natsoc goes all for natural way of things @🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅
Okay, however, I never assumed what your political ideology was
No TubeYou
Seems a little defensive of a response
People debating me like I am an anarchist
Just stating you all have a very diluted idea of what the ideology really is and the shades of it
@🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅 so, no what
"wouldn't fight each other over politics"
lmfao
there was fighting for the system to be installed in the first place
Human nature is a complex thing and people assume they can understand it to a T
It depends heavily on the kind of culture you are raised in
people in free nations have a natural drive to be ruled
people in authoritarian nations have a natural drive to be free
also have to account for religion