yeah yeah yeah, the only way to make change is to shoot rich people until you get your ass thrown in jail and the movement you support gets marked as an extremist group.

good game.

The best thing for a communist party to do in America is to try to target the imperialist sectors of industry like the military industrial complex and corrupt it from the inside to work as an anti imperialist movement

at the end of the day the only thing you ever did was made something you care about look like a joke (such as what the neo-Nazis have done) or radicals and no actual legislative progress is made.

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 ew

I believe that the worker should have rights and have a mutual relationship with tbe bourgeoisie and also that people should choose whether they want free healthcare/education or not and therefore make taxes a choice n shit.

Also no communist are not for individual acts of terror the revolution requires preparation

**Hammer of Populism with the Sword of Nationalism.**

**yeet**

Lol

The anti imperialist struggle in America is helpful for supporting third world communusts like PKP in phillpines and Naxalities in India when America funds the fight against then tbh.

Ibdia?

Im not a three world theorist

But i agree we should support comrades where we can.

Businesses should be able to deny access to certain people as long as it is not discriminatory

Like Starbucks

Private company, didn't buy so they didn't get to do shit in there

Not because Starbucks is racist

But becaise they have *rules*

@ajsbeast im quoting engels here
"Finally, the third category consists of democratic socialists who favor some of the same measures the communists advocate, as described in Question 18, not as part of the transition to communism, however, but as measures which they believe will be sufficient to abolish the misery and evils of present-day society
These democratic socialists are either proletarians who are not yet sufficiently clear about the conditions of the liberation of their class, or they are representatives of the petty bourgeoisie, a class which, prior to the achievement of democracy and the socialist measures to which it gives rise, has many interests in common with the proletariat.
."

Bernie was one of the few candidates that actually wanted to help comrades, but because he wasn't an extremist we should write him off.

a private company should have the choice to serve whoever they want

Ajs read engels word common policy is fine with democratic socialist if it is not in support of the bourgeoisie class

@notjojo vc thot

Taoism is cool

@Benny_Boi (weeb hunter) u miss spelt MAOISM

that makes sense, I don't think the bourgeoise support any degree of socialism, but they'll resist it incrementally less than instant revolution.

My problem is that bernie comes off as Keynesian and only implementing these policies as a means to appease the workers which is nice but not a fight towards the socialist goal of democratic ownership of the means of Production

I agree, but I'd rather have decent unions than our current state.

and he was one of the only people who supported that.

Im in support of unions i guess

he wanted to make the proletariat satisfied, there is no wrong in that.

I mean bismarck?

Bismarck was the guy who used social democracy to crush leftist movement

Wait

By Bismarck do you mean Otto?

John Maynard Keynes only took it on as a mesns to rectify the class stuggle in the post ww2 UK

@Benny_Boi (weeb hunter) yes

Oh nice

Bismarck supported social democracy

@notjojo