no

@FreemanTheDemon

@Scipio guess not

personal property

No he didnt

Well gg lad

Personal property =/= private property

Last time I checked he was a devoted communist

Personal property is what you can't use to make profits

private property = owning property for profit
personal property = owning property for personal use

uP

Thats not private property

proof?

so in the USSR, you have your own house, your car, etc. allowed by the state for personal intimate unlimited use

homelessness was eradicated

same for unemployment

"Private property is a legal designation for the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities.[1] Private property is distinguishable from public property, which is owned by a state entity; and from collective (or cooperative) property, which is owned by a group of non-governmental entities.[2][3] Private property can be either personal property (consumption goods) or capital goods. Private property is a legal concept defined and enforced by a country's political system"

USSE is my favorite country

USSE?

We are arguing over semantics

@Deleted User Not unlimited use.

R and E are right next to each other on my keyboard

Homelessness wasnt eradicated lmao

how is it not unlimited?

prove it then

It was E

show me sources that under stalin there was significant homelessness

Because it wasnt like private property.

If it was then the government wouldnt own your property.

Don't have to own a house to live in it

It may be personal property but the government still owned the property

you are definitely an idiot

No.

in the USSR you live in your house allocated by the state for free, how is it bad in any way

and prove me that there was homelessness

It wasnt free though.

And no.

how was it not free?

In order to eat.

Oh yeah forgot, a lot starved.

"I refuse to show my case to be true"