it basically took half of what you've defined it as. they took lands which was not their but the poles resisting was not anti imperialism

east germany was because allies declined a neutral german state

but ussr wasn't monopoly capitalism

Allies literally wanted to genocide the Germans

it isn't characteristic of it at all

Papon was a minister and massacred algerians in the streets of paris before he was called out for having been a nazi collaborator

lol yeah west ger, france and the US accepted fash in gov

USSR would see (as you just put it) poland and east germany as liberations

so would the allies see the coups as liberation

it goes both ways

Papon, Mitterand @Mr.AnalTwister4000

Laval

'allies see coups as liberation@

>gets rid of democracy

lol k

yes the allies see it as a way to spread evil and fear across the world and they don't feel like they're doing the right thing

100%

totally

the shah a monarch being in power is a 'democracy'

The US just accepted nazi scientists in high security project

Pinochet was a 'democracy'

evil is a baseless value

and you need a helicopter ride

dab

The iron curtain ironically helped Eastern Europe because now it's too poor for refugees to want to move there

the allies wanted to expand their hegemony for profit

Laval was far prior to west ger

it's not "evil", it's just in their interests and they won't let anything stand in their way

i'm talking about france Kristoffer

youre talking in the context of the GDR before the split was even a thing

from the allies POV, they are liberating through coup
from the USSR POV, they are liberating through conquest

this goes both ways

I was talking about post WW2 in general

They're both gay

Lee me alone

its just that the communist justify one method

in a long term

>Allies were doing it for the profit motive
>USSR wasn't
🤔

again

*from their POV*

Lol what