Message from @Advocatus Diaboli
Discord ID: 453656463009906708
At least it didn't rely on people starving
i imagine the government collected it forcefully
big farms are better than small ones
monopolies are good
B)
The gov bought it
>bought
>monopolies are good
They paid money to the kolkhozes
real money
they bought the food that they're taking by force
interesting
are you retarded?
what would happen in the event that a farmer refuses to sell his crop?
do you ever buy something while pointing a gun at the cashier
how can you take the food away and buy it at the same time?
that's exactly what im saying
what would happen in the event a farmer refuses to sell his crop?
why would he refuse?
*why wouldn't he?*
what would happen in that event anyway?
why would he refuse?
i believe i asked first
Kulaks deserved it
same reason why people dont sell their guns to the government during "buybacks"
kulaks were speculators
Marx endorsed guns
i am yet to see an answer
what would happen in the event a farmer refuses to sell his crop?
"Sell"
if there's enough food we leave him alone
yes "sell"
but im being generous
me want dismantlement of technoindustrial system NOW
right
right
so then you let him hoard the food
if there isn't we make him sell it
>make
>sell
LOL
yeah