Message from @Perpetual Moral Imbalance
Discord ID: 453656309322088448
Collectivization allowed the USSR to feed the entire population
I don't like Khrushchev
anyone remember the khmer rouge
Khmer Rouge weren't communist
tfw your boi chairman kills all the sparrows so locusts eat all your crops
My god collectivization left people starving.
Big farms are more efficient than the small ones
Where did all the food go, huh?
At least it didn't rely on people starving
i imagine the government collected it forcefully
big farms are better than small ones
monopolies are good
B)
The gov bought it
>bought
>monopolies are good
They paid money to the kolkhozes
real money
they bought the food that they're taking by force
interesting
are you retarded?
do you ever buy something while pointing a gun at the cashier
how can you take the food away and buy it at the same time?
that's exactly what im saying
what would happen in the event a farmer refuses to sell his crop?
why would he refuse?
*why wouldn't he?*
what would happen in that event anyway?
answer the question
why would he refuse?
i believe i asked first
Kulaks deserved it
same reason why people dont sell their guns to the government during "buybacks"
kulaks were speculators
Marx endorsed guns
i am yet to see an answer
what would happen in the event a farmer refuses to sell his crop?
"Sell"
if there's enough food we leave him alone
yes "sell"
but im being generous