i believe i asked first

Kulaks deserved it

same reason why people dont sell their guns to the government during "buybacks"

kulaks were speculators

Marx endorsed guns

i am yet to see an answer

what would happen in the event a farmer refuses to sell his crop?

"Sell"

if there's enough food we leave him alone

yes "sell"

but im being generous

me want dismantlement of technoindustrial system NOW

right

right

so then you let him hoard the food

if there isn't we make him sell it

>make
>sell

LOL

yeah

right

and by that you mean you take it

we pay him money

regardless of his wishes

because the government said so

sales are voluntary lmao

Yes

The government enforces his property rights to begin with

why should I care about wishes of a speculator if the people are starving and he just wants to make fucking money?

if I stole your child and gave you a dollar, did you sell your child to me?

if the people are starving then he'd have no option to sell his crop

which means he's being forced from the start

That seems like a strawman

random erections

morning wood

the people have money, but he doesn't want to sell the crops, he waits for the price to get as high as possible

if the people are starving truly like you say, the government won't care if he doesn't want to sell

see?

and they will take the food because they *need* the food

exactly like you said

mhm

It's nice having only 1% of the population farming