it doesn't really need to be functional beyond helping distinguish between members of a party imo

simbly not a fan of people telling me what i think because of my role based on their experiences with other users with it

Yeah I want a sub-party deal but I want like every party to have them

Some parties are like "nooo, that causes division"

you should hold a vote in each

only give it to the ones that want it innit

@gribos No just commies and anarchists and nazis.

For obvious reasons

i don't believe that you have anywhere near enough of an understanding of any to be so critical of them lol

and other retards of course.

I do. Nor do I care for what you believe.

You believe in anarchy

you dont know anything about what i believe lmao

i believe in the dismantlement of the technoinsustrial system

anarchy is not a prerequisite to that

I do which is why I disagree with you.

"you can't criticize me you don't know what i believe hur dur"

he can still criticize you for being a fucking retard

👀

That too.

how would he know if i'm a retard if he doesnt know what i believe you massive sperg

I do know what you believe. And its simple

it

he knows

if you say retarded shit all the time its obvious you're retarded.

and i know

because you're in the anarchist party

True.

i'm in the anarchist party because it's the closest of the available options to representing what i believe

"anarchist" doesnt really give any nuanced ideological implications

which is why its stupid to tell me what i believe lol

No I assumed what you believed by your party.

By all means explain your beliefs.

Hurry up.

i believe in the dismantlement of the technoindustrial system, as it limits autonomy and promotes decadence, in short

i'm a Kaczynski-ite

That all?

of course its not all, you told me to hurry up so i summarised it as concisely as i could

that's all you could write in two minutes?

"Theodore John Kaczynski (/kəˈzɪnski/; born May 22, 1942), also known as the Unabomber, is an American domestic terrorist." charming.

i typed out another paragraph but i realised i was going into a level of nuance that was unnecessary