no its bad for me

smh

We aren't adding more parties for an ideology that has like 7 ppl in it.

what about subsections of that party

that can be collectivised in a meaningful way

for example just add an "ancom" role to differentiate between them and anarchists that arent retarded

that would be given to people who are already in the anarchist party

There will be sub-parties

They don't do much though

it doesn't really need to be functional beyond helping distinguish between members of a party imo

simbly not a fan of people telling me what i think because of my role based on their experiences with other users with it

Yeah I want a sub-party deal but I want like every party to have them

Some parties are like "nooo, that causes division"

you should hold a vote in each

only give it to the ones that want it innit

@gribos No just commies and anarchists and nazis.

For obvious reasons

i don't believe that you have anywhere near enough of an understanding of any to be so critical of them lol

and other retards of course.

I do. Nor do I care for what you believe.

You believe in anarchy

you dont know anything about what i believe lmao

i believe in the dismantlement of the technoinsustrial system

anarchy is not a prerequisite to that

I do which is why I disagree with you.

"you can't criticize me you don't know what i believe hur dur"

he can still criticize you for being a fucking retard

👀

That too.

how would he know if i'm a retard if he doesnt know what i believe you massive sperg

I do know what you believe. And its simple

it

he knows

if you say retarded shit all the time its obvious you're retarded.

and i know

because you're in the anarchist party

True.

i'm in the anarchist party because it's the closest of the available options to representing what i believe

"anarchist" doesnt really give any nuanced ideological implications

which is why its stupid to tell me what i believe lol

No I assumed what you believed by your party.