I want Vegas to be less dependent on The Casinos.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-met-supreme-court-unions-kass-0228-story.html

@Deleted User I HIGLY recommend you read this article https://www.thenation.com/article/right-to-work-laws-are-killing-democrats-at-the-ballot-box/

So basically Unions are a form of Power & funding for Demo-tards?

Right-to-work opposition on this ground is hilarious because you can even say this about gay marriage.

Not just that but also if you choose not to join a union you're less likely to vote for who they tell you to vote for

I see.

Less Political Influence.

Or lessening thereof.

Just like how gay issues are a slippery slope due to their cultural effects, RTW laws are a slippery slope where you choose not to join a union, and then you support it less than you would if you were forced to join it.

And a lot of Get Out the Vote is done by Unions. They will have a huge volunteering problem. Did you see in that article that Wisconsin being Righrh to work reduced Democrat margins by 8% they estimate?

Plus all the funding that Unions give Dems

Indeed.

@Den So in essence Republicans are Politically Cracking down on Democrats.

Through this & many other methods I suppose.

Now how could I also get "Nevada Question 1" repealed?

Or is it worth repealing?

The less Democrat power in the state the easier it will be to repel

Yes 😇

The unholy Zio-Marxist Demo-tards will be ***ANNIHILATED!***

😈

@Den 8%? That will definitely make a huge difference. Hopefully the supreme court gets on that.

Yeah I think it's ridiculous from a legal PoV due to _Lochner v. New York_.

However, the SCOTUS has been disregarding _Lochner_ since FDR.

@FLanon I went back and reread the article. It actually cost them about 3.5% of the vote in Wiscons

"In a new study that will soon be released as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, James Feigenbaum of Boston University, Alexander Hertel-Fernandez of Columbia, and Vanessa Williamson of the Brookings Institution examined the long-term political consequences of anti-union legislation by comparing counties straddling a state line where one state is right-to-work and another is not. Their findings should strike terror into the hearts of Democratic Party strategists: Right-to-work laws decreased Democratic presidential vote share by 3.5 percent."

So Trump's win in WI can be attributed partially to right to work. That is definitely interesting.

And I think it will reduce Democrat share even farther in my opinion. Just because the law is realarively knew in Wisconsin

Oh I guess Nevada is right to work already. Never mind

In the turquoise are the right to work states.

This has the potential to flip the entire northeast.

Ohio and PA could become solidly red, NH and ME moreso, and a ton of other states will become more purple.

I feel pretty good about Pennsylvania being a red state in the future. It's just one more thing we have working in our favor there

Connecticut, Delaware, Rhode Island maybe (probably not though cuz college town)

@Den Yeah, from the amish vote to right to work, PA shows all the signs of leaning more red.

Not to mention Minnesota, of course.

It looks like the Wisconsin Law is only 3 years old. (March 2015) I'm sure not everyone who is paying union dues stopped right away. I bet you won't see the whole effect until 2020

In Wiscons

If SCOTUS makes Right To Work National this summer it would have a huge impact on 2020

I think maps like this could be tenable in 2030