Message from @FLanon
Discord ID: 427628913842454529
437-101
I'm thinking long game here
perhaps a more realistic number then
I'll give a year, 2036
is that too far off to get anything accurate?
no
um
assuming turnout level is equal amongst all race groups,
and third party vote is minimal,
A Republican would need to win 82% of the White Vote to snatch victory
assuming the minority vote is what
brb
alright then
actually, no
assuming Non-Whites vote the way they do now (7-3 for Democrats)
Whites will need to vote Republican by 72% to carry them to the White House
The White Electorate currently votes Republican at a rate of 58%
So from here on to now,
Whites need to shift 14 points more Republican as a whole
in two decades
but again,
this is assuming Non-Whites keep voting the same way they do now
and if all race group turnouts are balanced
So what white vote do we need if minorities vote 6-4 for democrats in that year?
68.8%
Hey guys
Well, alright then. Thanks, this has been enlightening.
These are the two things we must do in regards to racial demographics to remain as a viable political class:
First, get whites to vote as a right wing bloc. Show the democrats as the anti-white party, a party which seeks the destruction of all whites.
Second, get a larger portion of the minority vote. We will never have a majority with them, no matter what Ben Shapiro says. However, we *can* improve our margins. This can be done by simply having a stronger platform, and in the case of the asians, showing how democratic policies like Affirmative Action have harmed them the most. With these groups you have to play civic nationalist.
Yep.
I believe we can have a majority of the Asian vote again, as we have in the past.
And we can have majorities of anti-Communist Hispanics and blacks, including Cubans.
Hell, we can possibly accomplish majorities of devout Hispanic Catholics.
However, we cannot actually acquire majorities of nonwhites.
We can strengthen our support among them but I see that happening through outreach that isn't plain old pandering.
Yeah.
Civnat is the only way to play with minorities.
By the way, wouldn't the margin whites would need be 61% if nonwhites voted 6-4, not 68%? If nonwhites voted 5-5, we'd need 50% (obviously), so I don't get it. Why does increasing our margins once get us 4% less of the white vote needed then the same increase again get us 18% less?
I just don't get the math.
Is this real?