And whoever is closer to being correct, we'll go by from now o

Because to me this is just crazy, this is way too forgiving to republicans.

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Also Iowa's tilt republican lmao

It's just an unedited, mainstream prediction.

He said it was from Inside Elections

Iowa...tilt Republican?

I said I derive from them, yeah.

I edit whatever is wrong.

And Iowa is much more Republican than they predict

🦅

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Get a load of this MAGAPeede

(only joking Nuke don't get mad)

I don't understand why Iowa voted for obama in 2012

Such retards

It's better to underestimate than overestimate.

Let's not put the shoe on the other foot and do what Democrats did in 2016

Those central New York districts are historically Republican.

I thought Richard Hanna was basically a leftist infiltrator, though.

So I thought Tenney would really hold her seat, solid R.

Richard Hanna actually voted for Hillary Clinton, held ERA rallies, did fundraising for Democrats, etc.

And he often lacked opposition

So his primaries were more competitive than his general elections

http://www.270towin.com/2018-house-election/DKDJo0V

Here's a revised edition of today's prediction.

still wrong.

MN, IA, CA are wrong.

MN is pretty accurate tbh

I listed both of those as toss-ups.

yeah that's kinda the point of them

To call a toss-up within saying it's not a toss-up

The 8-color map doesn't make much sense without that.

oh right

almost all of the remaining toss-ups I accidentally left on the revised map are actually Republican likely/lean/tilt districts.

Hey, my map is better. Just saying.

It's up there.

Before your discussion.

Western Colorado?

I'll need to look at it later. Must've been a strong incumbent.

Wait, Coffman's district?

I might have to change that to tilt, to be honest. He's the sort of "true conservative" who could win a Karen district like this.

http://www.270towin.com/2018-house-election/3lvPP4p