I derive my ratings from Inside Elections, and in this case I just went with their rating for CA-45.

They're being overly fair.

I mean

overly biased lol

They're also a biased, left-wing rating org.

There's no way you can look at CA-45 and tell me that's lean.

Of course

I intentionally use them because that way, you cannot accuse them of bias.

Thats how you energize your party duh Nuke.

If you make districts appear harder than they really are to take.

Your voters won't get lazuy.

And they'll overperform.

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Tilt

The opposite of what they did in 2016.

wait wait wait

What did you do with CA-39?

I didn't edit CA-39 either.

What is it put as?

Issa's seat is a tossup?

Are you kidding me?

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Why

Why is CA-49 tossup

Oh, right

I think I actually did list Edward Royce as a lean Republican.

....

Nuke c'mon man.

And CA-49 was left unedited because it's a toss-up, and Issa isn't running.

How is an R+1 where the democrat is outraising the Republican by huge amounts, is ahead in every poll, and we have no incumbency advantage a tossup?

Because AMERICANS live in Issa's district.

dear lord

Yeah no.

I think what we need to do.

Yeah and Issa won.

button, you make your preditions a few days before the election, and Nuke make his

And whoever is closer to being correct, we'll go by from now o

Because to me this is just crazy, this is way too forgiving to republicans.

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Also Iowa's tilt republican lmao

It's just an unedited, mainstream prediction.

He said it was from Inside Elections

Iowa...tilt Republican?

I said I derive from them, yeah.