Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃
Discord ID: 420646748441149440
Yep.
I think Michele would rally them and if she's smart she'll know flipping Texas is the only way to win.
but the thing is....Michelle Obama's only experience is as First Lady
Yep.
I don't think she can win on the dumbass leftist vote alone
a lot of leftists won't be able to take her seriously
also, I think you should at least make New Hampshire red in 2020 if it's Michelle Obama
IMO, if it's Michelle Obama, Trump would win all his 2016 states, plus: New Hampshire, Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado (for sure)
and possibly: New York, New Jersey, Maine-At-Large,
hell, maybe even more than that
Texas might flip blue in 2020 if trump never gets immigration done before then but even in that scenario it is unlikely that there would be enough to be rallied to flip the state in that amount of time
Texas will flip in 2023
*24
Yeah that makes more sense
Already nonwhite-majority
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 lol but who knows how many Hispanics will be deported by then
hopefully we can secure the Midwest and maybe parts of New England by then
lot of white rural voters without college degrees in New England
But yeah we either need to prevent Texas from flipping or find a viable alternative if we want to hold on to the presidency
i'm confident places like Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire will flip red within the next decade (screencap this)
"
The district itself is heavily republican for western p it is mostly more white collar neighborhoods. Democrats are motivated and aregoing to show up. There is no doubt they have enthusiasm.. the Rs have been very acrive in this race. Canvassing ad buys etc.
Lamb may pull it off if republicans don’t show up.
Should Lamb win it won’t be because the Rs didn’t fight. It will be because their message didn’t motivate.
And for the record I live in this district.
Most of saccones ads have been tying lamb to Pelosi...along with standard R messaging. Lower taxes, stronger defense.. etc. they have attacked Lamb with pelosi’s crumbs comments as well.
But what they have not done effectively in my mind is tie saccone to Trump. His name is not mentioned often by either candidate and I understand why Lamb doesn’t say it but the pro saccone ads not explicitly stating saccone will stand with Trumps MAGA agenda and is needed to continue it has not been part of any advertising I have seen.
I think this is a big mistake, you have to get the MAGA voters engaged and I don’t think saccones and the R PAC messaging is going to do that.
We will see soon, but if Lamb wins it won’t be because Rs didn’t fight it will be because their messaging did not motivate turnout."
Idiot Republican strategists!
Focus on immigration and the culture war!
that's all that matters!
Free Republic really, really, really needs to update their layout
it looks like it hasn't changed since the Clinton administration
hell, it probably hasn't
it's a GREAT website to see what right-wing boomers think though
@Deleted User breaking news
in development now,
the President is urging Gov. Bryant to appoint himself as Senator of Mississippi
Link?
I didn't even know self-appointment was _possible_.
But this is stupid.
Why appoint yourself to Senate?
I am the senate now
"
I think this race is tight for two reasons:
1) Lamb is a long-established name in Pittsburgh Democrat politics. Members of that family have held public office here going back three generations. Many of them are well-liked personally, even by people who don’t typically vote Democrat.
2) There is a general sense of disgust by local Republicans who went to the wall getting Tim Murphy elected over and over only to find in the end that he was a two-faced phony. With friends like that does the Pro Life movement need any enemies? I think a lot of those voters are wary if investing themselves in another Republican campaign. How do they know Saccone won’t turn out to be another one?"
ITS TIGHT BECAUSE REPUBLICUCK BRAINLETS AREN'T FOCUSING ON IMMIGRATION AND THE CULTURE WAR