yeah honestly.

That would work well.

Like Gingrich did.

If they don't support these points in Trump's agenda, they go.

wait, wait

there are Republican districts where Trump isn't popular, remember

In that case, rejecting the contract shouldn't be a high price for them there.

we'd have to be willing to give up a few in exchange for other districts

That's the price we'll have to pay then.

No more half-measures.

we'd have to go full-in with Minnesota

Yes. We also have to approach blue dogs with the contract.

Test their loyalties.

You'll never make Minnesota red.

Minnesota went Blue for Reagan, when the entire country went Red.

And now it's full of muslims.

You don't get the dynamics very well.

Trends still exsist lol.

History is consistent,.

This is a different Republican party than in the Reagan age.

Also, Mondale was from Minnesota.

It took them hours to call it in 2016.

What makes you think it could go red.

If it's entire history has been blue.

The message.

It's like trying to make Washington and Oregon red, they're all white, but they will vote democrat forever.

I should point out

we're not trying to make the whole state red

just the specific districts

the rural, White no-college districts that went for Trump by double digits

The working class voters in Minnesota.

In the Reagan age, he couldn't give any less of a shit about them, Trump's message was very different.

@FLanon @zakattack04

Fucking urban voters...

we're going for the 7, 8 and 1

Fair.

which are currently held by vulnerable Democrats

1 of which has retired

but it's fair to say we won't get the Senate seat in MN

either of them

the Twin Cities have too much electoral weight