Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃

Discord ID: 431495480195809280


2018-04-05 03:51:07 UTC  

SAY IT WITH ME
MADAME PRESIDENT <:annstweets:427608282673315860> <:hillaryforamerica:422438036614152203>

2018-04-05 03:52:08 UTC  

MADAME PRESIDENT!!!!!!

2018-04-05 03:54:17 UTC  

HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US!

2018-04-05 03:54:58 UTC  

GODDAMN IT HANK!!!!!

2018-04-05 15:10:41 UTC  

WTF

2018-04-05 15:10:53 UTC  

@FLanon NATIONAL GUARD ON BORDER WON'T BE ARMED

2018-04-05 15:13:07 UTC  

@FLanon Defend this right NOW

2018-04-05 15:13:49 UTC  

Trump once AGAIN backpeddling on what I thought would've been a great move by him

2018-04-05 15:47:04 UTC  

apparently they'll be used in support roles, hmm

2018-04-05 15:47:26 UTC  

the reason being that Mexico says their bilateral agreement will be in danger if the border is 'militarized'

2018-04-05 15:57:06 UTC  

So guys, I made a thing

2018-04-05 15:57:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/431482504365735946/Modern_Colonial_flag.png

2018-04-05 15:58:56 UTC  

If america has a second revolution this should be the flag. but I'm thinking of putting a single star in the middle to have 49 instead of 50 stars for each state. because I don't count California as america <:smugpepe:422445820034416648>

2018-04-05 16:06:52 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Indefensible really; this won't go well with independent voters.

2018-04-05 16:48:30 UTC  

@Nuke I think the fact that they're unarmed won't be much of an issue

2018-04-05 16:48:36 UTC  

they still can function as a deterrent

2018-04-05 16:48:41 UTC  

are you insane?

2018-04-05 16:48:54 UTC  

and at hte same time, our relations with the Mexican Government won't be hurt

2018-04-05 16:48:59 UTC  

What's the point of deploying the national guard if they can't SHOOT THE FUCKING ILLEGALS?

2018-04-05 16:49:50 UTC  

spotting them

2018-04-05 16:49:56 UTC  

doing support fork for border patrol

2018-04-05 16:49:56 UTC  

etc

2018-04-05 16:50:18 UTC  

and if issues do arise, you can always just arm them later

2018-04-05 16:50:54 UTC  

also....no one is really talking about that for some reason

2018-04-05 16:50:59 UTC  

I'm not seeing any mention of this on /pol/

2018-04-05 16:51:22 UTC  

sounds like a non-issue

2018-04-05 16:51:27 UTC  

because everyone on /pol/ is a Trump enthusiast and personality cultist

2018-04-05 16:51:52 UTC  

and they kiss his ass no matter what he does, because it was never about policy with them

2018-04-05 16:52:56 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 lol not even everyone on /ptg/ is Blumpf Cultist

2018-04-05 17:02:02 UTC  

Excellent.

2018-04-05 17:02:13 UTC  

Tim Pawlenty is a name we need running in MN.

2018-04-05 17:02:20 UTC  

We need way more big names running.

2018-04-05 17:02:37 UTC  

I think the main reason the Dems had any clout up until now was that they had big names

2018-04-05 17:02:48 UTC  

Old, famous politicians who had big accomplishments and hadn't died yet

2018-04-05 17:02:55 UTC  

and now like, who's really old on the (D) side?

2018-04-05 17:03:11 UTC  

Even Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are actually new to politics

2018-04-05 17:03:31 UTC  

All the Democrats' extremely powerful candidates, like John Glenn and Ted Kennedy, are dead.

2018-04-05 17:04:05 UTC  

They don't have the kind of down-to-earth, prestigious type of charisma where they can say things like "There is not yet a cure for the common birthday."