@FLanon BLUMPF, KING OF INCONSISTENCY

Even then, he wanted to pull out of Syria *days ago*

And then nothing happened.

That's not what matters

Trump's message -was- "America First", but then he went neocon for Israel.

@FLanon THE OL' SWITCHEROO

What matters is the message he wants to give to the voters

Trump has shown time and time again

He is a liar

Nothing will happen

Just watch

Everyone’s having a huge meltdown

@FLanon
Trump: Obama didn't ban bump stocks! I will!
Also Trump: I will defend the second amendment
No message at *all*

He tries so hard to satisfy everyone

Hey button

in the end, he alienates **everyone**

his base is irritated

Read the Wordpress article Mr Red Storm put out

and the people he tries to win over don't believe him

First item on the not to do list

Button Mash is David Brock 2.0

Is he an isolationist? Is he a nationalist? Is he a neocon? Is he a libertarian? Is he a compassionate conservative? The thing about Trump that will hurt him big time is that if he continues to sort of fuck around like this, it will tank his entire presidency.

Because I'm calling out Trump for betraying his campaign promises?

He had a message and it was perfectly fine.

America First.

@Rhodesiaboo i'm sorry, but if you're going to defend Trump no matter what he does, you're the true shill here

Button, read it

I’m not

I’m just saying

I know, he's changing the fundamentals of the server which is well and good

If Bombing that airfield did nothing

This won’t do anything either

That's not the point

No, I said read the first point on the not to do list

It's the message

Trump is 90% rhetoric to keep people from knowing what he's actually going to do. And ultimately: what he usually does is kick legislative decisions down to the legislators. Trump can't ban bump stocks: he quite literally does not have the authority to do so. The legislature would have to write a bill declaring bump stocks illegal, pass the house and senate, get to his desk and then he could sign it.

Even if he does nothing

and the inconsistency

one second

he's isolationist

then he's interventionalist