Message from @FLanon

Discord ID: 432655132229107722


2018-04-08 21:35:30 UTC  

@Gigglemesh Twitter has been the Stasi for a while now

2018-04-08 21:35:36 UTC  

Chinese Exclusion Act was an example of competent Congress

2018-04-08 21:35:39 UTC  

IMO Twitter is worse than Facebook

2018-04-08 21:35:40 UTC  

Yeah, democracy can't work in the ME and Africa

2018-04-08 21:35:42 UTC  

"The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words, either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except insofar as this is done by the affirmative declaration that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." In this as in other respects, it must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274. [p655]"

2018-04-08 21:35:50 UTC  

Also 1924 Immigration Act

2018-04-08 21:35:54 UTC  

^

2018-04-08 21:36:02 UTC  

however it continues with stuff like the original Immigration Act which excluded whites

2018-04-08 21:36:05 UTC  

Thanks for explaining the specifics of jus soli btw

2018-04-08 21:36:09 UTC  

and it goes on with how blacks have citizenship

2018-04-08 21:36:20 UTC  

actually, here's another question you guys can consider

If you found yourself mind controlling Trump right now, what would you do?

(in this scenario, we're starting from right now, not January 20, 2017)

2018-04-08 21:36:21 UTC  

and eventually it basically declares that Chinese (Asians) are also citizens by this logic

2018-04-08 21:36:22 UTC  

National Origins Quota is vital

2018-04-08 21:36:33 UTC  

However it leaves the door open to excluding people

2018-04-08 21:36:36 UTC  

Well, I'd fire every globalist in the admin

2018-04-08 21:36:38 UTC  

Anyway, can we think of strategies to get 2nd/3rd generation Mexican immigrants to vote red?

2018-04-08 21:36:38 UTC  

In fact the Constitution does this _outright_

2018-04-08 21:36:51 UTC  

They wont

2018-04-08 21:36:53 UTC  

Start the America First Contract

2018-04-08 21:36:55 UTC  

Congress has just voided the "Indians untaxed" exception by granting citizenship to and taxing all natives.

2018-04-08 21:37:01 UTC  

Stop using Twitter like a fucking brainlet

2018-04-08 21:37:10 UTC  

also it's National Origins Formula

2018-04-08 21:37:19 UTC  

I'd have a clear, consistent message.

2018-04-08 21:37:26 UTC  

It was a quota

2018-04-08 21:37:33 UTC  

So close enough

2018-04-08 21:37:49 UTC  

Also

2018-04-08 21:37:52 UTC  

Really, the best presidents are the strongmen

2018-04-08 21:38:21 UTC  

Hispanics will vote red when the Indian is bred out of them

2018-04-08 21:38:27 UTC  

Like FLanon

2018-04-08 21:38:32 UTC  

This is politics, you don't play exactly by the rules to get what you want done.

2018-04-08 21:38:37 UTC  

Eventually, this is the important part of the ruling

2018-04-08 21:38:46 UTC  

I didn't get any indio in the first place

2018-04-08 21:38:54 UTC  

You sure?

2018-04-08 21:39:02 UTC  

I'm sure, yes.

2018-04-08 21:39:06 UTC  

"The fact, therefore, that acts of Congress or treaties have not permitted Chinese persons born out of this country to become citizens by naturalization, cannot exclude Chinese persons born in this country from the operation of the broad and clear words of the Constitution, "All persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.""

2018-04-08 21:39:28 UTC  

Okay Castro

2018-04-08 21:39:37 UTC  

Whatever ya say

2018-04-08 21:39:54 UTC  

They never were in central america

2018-04-08 21:43:41 UTC  
2018-04-08 21:46:13 UTC  

>Castro

lmao