O

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 is it just me or do you sound salty about it?

I'd love someone to recreate it.

I've a lot of polls I could post in here.

I regularly post them on my server.

ik you do

The server you abandoned cause it was leaked?

I assume that's why you were asking for emails?

Just curious

Someone made a <#433049535208620042> channel, go ask questions

And chat dies

Nope. It's still alive and well. It's just in preparation.

Ok, neat

Got some polls for you gentlemen.

Ok cool

If we don't see a Syrian invasion. I'll eat my hat. I'm losing faith in dear president Twump

First the air base attack, now this

We need to let countries govern themselves

Umm

If this goes through. Jihadi groups will rise and we will be worse of than before, and not only that it will create more refugees. and we all know how that turns out

but this is my own speculation

Look I get the whole govern yourself deal but, I think chemical weapons are too far for anyone/

Those have been banned since WWI globally.

I don't think Assad launched those attack. why would he attack his own citizens?

Furthermore, what we're doing to North Korea right now, is inherently anti-nationalist and pretty globalist oriented, there's a balance between the two.

Especially when they were on the verge of wiping out isis

Defeat them into submission, it's entirely possible.

You attack civilians, they lose the will to fight.

As in any war.

I'm not saying it's 100% certain.

but it'as likely.

But the citizens were mostly fine with assad before the Islamic state rose

I just don't see the reasoning behind it

and not to mention

Well maybe before, but they aren't now.

Motives change.

That ISIS and other Jihadi groups have been know to launch chemical weapon attacks

But they haven't, at least not that I've heard of,.

In Iraq

it was always in Syria it seemed.

There was a raid on a chemical weapons factory run by rebel groups