Message from @zakattack04

Discord ID: 433057653694922754


2018-04-09 23:45:36 UTC  

Someone made a <#433049535208620042> channel, go ask questions

2018-04-09 23:49:01 UTC  

And chat dies

2018-04-09 23:51:52 UTC  

Nope. It's still alive and well. It's just in preparation.

2018-04-09 23:52:30 UTC  

Ok, neat

2018-04-10 00:02:25 UTC  

Got some polls for you gentlemen.

2018-04-10 00:06:42 UTC  

Ok cool

2018-04-10 00:11:07 UTC  

If we don't see a Syrian invasion. I'll eat my hat. I'm losing faith in dear president Twump

2018-04-10 00:11:44 UTC  

First the air base attack, now this

2018-04-10 00:12:05 UTC  

We need to let countries govern themselves

2018-04-10 00:13:20 UTC  

Umm

2018-04-10 00:13:33 UTC  

If this goes through. Jihadi groups will rise and we will be worse of than before, and not only that it will create more refugees. and we all know how that turns out

2018-04-10 00:14:03 UTC  

but this is my own speculation

2018-04-10 00:14:11 UTC  

Look I get the whole govern yourself deal but, I think chemical weapons are too far for anyone/

2018-04-10 00:14:59 UTC  

Those have been banned since WWI globally.

2018-04-10 00:15:19 UTC  

I don't think Assad launched those attack. why would he attack his own citizens?

2018-04-10 00:15:33 UTC  

Furthermore, what we're doing to North Korea right now, is inherently anti-nationalist and pretty globalist oriented, there's a balance between the two.

2018-04-10 00:15:51 UTC  

Especially when they were on the verge of wiping out isis

2018-04-10 00:15:57 UTC  

Defeat them into submission, it's entirely possible.

2018-04-10 00:16:11 UTC  

You attack civilians, they lose the will to fight.

2018-04-10 00:16:22 UTC  

As in any war.

2018-04-10 00:16:30 UTC  

I'm not saying it's 100% certain.

2018-04-10 00:16:33 UTC  

but it'as likely.

2018-04-10 00:16:55 UTC  

But the citizens were mostly fine with assad before the Islamic state rose

2018-04-10 00:17:20 UTC  

I just don't see the reasoning behind it

2018-04-10 00:17:25 UTC  

and not to mention

2018-04-10 00:17:34 UTC  

Well maybe before, but they aren't now.

2018-04-10 00:17:36 UTC  

Motives change.

2018-04-10 00:18:14 UTC  

That ISIS and other Jihadi groups have been know to launch chemical weapon attacks

2018-04-10 00:18:34 UTC  

But they haven't, at least not that I've heard of,.

2018-04-10 00:18:36 UTC  

In Iraq

2018-04-10 00:18:47 UTC  

it was always in Syria it seemed.

2018-04-10 00:19:07 UTC  

There was a raid on a chemical weapons factory run by rebel groups

2018-04-10 00:19:17 UTC  

In Syria though?

2018-04-10 00:19:23 UTC  

yes

2018-04-10 00:19:26 UTC  

Why would ISIS be using chemical weapons only in Syria.

2018-04-10 00:19:37 UTC  

because ISIS doesn't have borders.

2018-04-10 00:21:48 UTC  

Probably to pin it on Assad. the only on-the-ground group in Syria saying that this is assad are the white helmets. a jihadi rebel group that is benifiting from these attacks

2018-04-10 00:23:01 UTC  

you're telling me with the amount of electronic, satellite, and on ground surveillance we have in the region, no one actually fucking knows who fired the gas.

2018-04-10 00:23:31 UTC  

It's not easy to manufacture this stuff, especially on a weaponized scale, how hard can it be to trace?

2018-04-10 00:24:22 UTC  

True. That's just what I heard. but there's holes in each story

2018-04-10 00:24:39 UTC  

let me quickly fact check this