Message from @FLanon
Discord ID: 433698845076226048
It's a changing field.
More people are cutting their cable
Remember, Obama was the one who supposedly rid Assad of chemical weapons
The ones he used to kill his own people
And thus the murders are the fault of Obama
Yeah he gets away with it
Because democrats get away with everything
Remember Lois Learner?
No
Weaponizing the most powerful government agency (IRS) in the world against Republicans
She used the IRS to audit Conservative PACs until they had no money
Ah
It was like 100:1 Republican PAC vs Democratic PACs audited
And someone even admitted that's what they were doing
She simply walked away
Nothing happened
Hilary and Bill Clinton
Nothing happened to them
Obama abusing the FISA warrant process, he was fine...
Yeah, there's disproportionate levels of scrutiny from the media
How?
George Soros and other Democrats will keep bank rolling these faggots
Money is money
I mean by other means
Legislation
No way you could get enough popular support for that
The TV media will stay the same, but social media can be used effectively.
Sure I can.
Running on a populist message, and battling the silicon valley elites for free speech. Sounds perfectly ripe for potential.
Well I mean
That sounds good until you bring up the part where you use the federal government to beat businesses into submission
Because they don't support our view point
It's not about supporting a viewpoint
It's about an even playing field
But is the government really the way to do that? That seems extremely authoritarian. Why not do it from the ground up
Get people to support the cause in making new social media platforms
The issue is that social media is a field which encourages consolidating into a few organizations.
If someone wants to speak with you over social media, it's just unwieldy to have 500 different ones and update them all regularly.
And also "beating up businesses" is not a fair assessment of what this does.
It doesn't cost them a cent.