(and that's a good thing)

Thoughts?

It's simple, it's effective

I like the first one better

I think this is a vastly improved style over my professional style.

"She's not catholic" is more emotionally gripping

The main problem I see is that I don't think non-Catholics will be moved much.

Will they?

Well what's the religious makeup of the district?

Not sure. Can you find that data, @🎃Boo-ton🎃

http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/blackwhiteandgray/files/2012/04/Religion-in-America-map.gif

From what I can tell based on this pic, Catholicism is the plurality religion.

Catholics/methodists

So it could have an effect, especially when considering it's mostly a white district

@Nuke

Every district in Louisiana except 4 and 5 is Catholic

district is evangelical

Well, I think it's effective

And to non-catholics it'll just show her as a liar which is good enough

AZ-01 is a rare one: Native American Mormon

Arizona Senate GE:
Sinema (D) 51% (+8)
Ward (R) 43%
.
Sinema (D) 51% (+9)
McSally (R) 42%
.
Sinema (D) 61% (+29)
Arpaio (R) 32%

Ward takes the lead

It's stunning that AZ-01 is securely Democrat yet voted for Trump.

It went for Trump by less than a percentage point

Anti-Trump asses really screwed us that election.

What's really surprising is how Minnesota's rural districts remained blue

A friend suggested that I should add a hashtag.

I wonder how Catholics are perceived in the non-Louisiana parts of the Deep South

No idea tbh

That hashtag could work for a lot of the other "catholic democrats" who've voted for that kind of stuff

Based on the liberal Protestants I've met here

Very negatively

just found an unbelievable vulnerability in Ron Kind (WI-3)

just

dang

WI-3, according to Button Mash's map, is a Catholic district.

>liberal Protestants

are they Black