I mean we could push a ton of this out on 4chan or something and see maybe see it spread from there

Group page really, not mine

That's good

I think like a Red Storm facebook group or something

That would be great.

Mine are too verbose btw.

<:dixieflag:422468859157544960>

I don't really get why "diversity" is even an issue for district courts with only 1 judge.

As Buchanan would say

White Democrats in the Deep South,

are on the verge of EXTINCTION

(and that's a good thing)

Thoughts?

It's simple, it's effective

I like the first one better

I think this is a vastly improved style over my professional style.

"She's not catholic" is more emotionally gripping

The main problem I see is that I don't think non-Catholics will be moved much.

Will they?

Well what's the religious makeup of the district?

Not sure. Can you find that data, @🎃Boo-ton🎃

http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/blackwhiteandgray/files/2012/04/Religion-in-America-map.gif

From what I can tell based on this pic, Catholicism is the plurality religion.

Catholics/methodists

So it could have an effect, especially when considering it's mostly a white district

@Nuke

Every district in Louisiana except 4 and 5 is Catholic

district is evangelical

Well, I think it's effective

And to non-catholics it'll just show her as a liar which is good enough

AZ-01 is a rare one: Native American Mormon

Arizona Senate GE:
Sinema (D) 51% (+8)
Ward (R) 43%
.
Sinema (D) 51% (+9)
McSally (R) 42%
.
Sinema (D) 61% (+29)
Arpaio (R) 32%

Ward takes the lead

It's stunning that AZ-01 is securely Democrat yet voted for Trump.

It went for Trump by less than a percentage point

Anti-Trump asses really screwed us that election.

What's really surprising is how Minnesota's rural districts remained blue

A friend suggested that I should add a hashtag.