unfortunately even then we'd need to win both tossup seats to be able to propose constitutional amendments

the thing is, what kind of constitutional amendments do you have in mind

Re enslave the blacks *dab*

lmao

Removing birthright citizenship probably

Even then I'm sure there'd be rogue republicans

Fucking 14th amendment ruined America

Removing birthright citizenship can be done with a 60-vote majority.

The problem is doing it retroactively.

Also this is the House

How would people become citizens then? I’m simply curious

Also that’s a damn positive looking map Nuke

They don't have birthright citizenship in other countries

The Congress has the authority to modify the common law definition of "by birth"

Therefore you can actually modify it to mean something like

In some other countries at least

"conceived in an American mother, or by an American father, or both"

I see

And remove the geolocation-based definition

And another thing to keep in mind is that the map is if Korea fucking unites

It will be fun to see the “dreamers” squirm if that happens

So it will of course be near-absurdly positive

The “Dreamer” program was a mistake

of course it was

Obama tried to extend it to parents too

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

But I think a Texas court if I remember stopped it

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

God bless Texas

Yep, I think SCOTUS rejected it too.

Also

If you amend that to say

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, prior to midnight Eastern Standard Time, on January 1, 1981;

You denaturalize all persons without American parents since 1981.

In other words, all anchor babies.

The problem is that we don't know if this is legal.

ex post facto

Looks like we’ve got some new people in customs

Also that seems interesting

Indeed.