Message from @shrub
Discord ID: 460276530027954177
I think McGovern wins more.
Mostly in the South
Then again, maybe not
What are you writing
I write fiction mainly
The year is 1972, in this timeline, Wallace is never shot and goes on to win the Democratic primaries, while Nixon faces the Watergate scandal earlier than in our timeline due to the burglars giving testimony earlier and more leaks from the White House than in our timeline, leading to the Watergate Committee forming during 1972 instead of 1973. Due to the investigation still being in its early phases, Nixon's approval rating is not disastrous and many in Washington still see a path to victory for him. The more liberal wing of the Democratic party, outraged by the top two candidates being in the right wing, see McGovern run a campaign under the Liberal banner. He is still seen as a left wing extremist by Middle America and he only benefits marginally from an earlier Watergate scandal, picking up the states of South Dakota, Minnesota, and Rhode Island. Wallace runs a massive populist campaign, targeting the perceived corruption in the White House and promising to bring the troops home from Vietnam, calling it a failed promise by Nixon who used it in his campaign back in 1968. Wallace, for his controversial platforms, sees major protests at his rallies and even an assassination attempt, one which this time sees him unscathed. The night comes, and Wallace, to the shock of many, manages not only to win states in the deep south as he did back in 1968, but manages to win the extended lines of Dixie and many states in the rust belt. Wallace's win is met with extreme backlash from the political left and the Republican party, which after Nixon's loss moves somewhat further to the center, leading to a period of intense political division much greater than Nixon's term.
thoughts?
sounds good to me tbh
So what do you write?
mostly political analysis
Ah that's cool
I write fiction stuff
fantasy/sci fi
Escapist stuff
gotcha
don't really have a knack for fiction and all when it comes to writing, at least not unless there's a sort of message I can take away from it at the end
I've been writing about one were a raider from a raider camp has to prove himself and kill a large game to earn his keep aka get more gains during raids etc go up in rank. With two others. @FLanon other shit happens
ah ok
One of the fiction books I've read that didn't have like an obvious sort of message to it was The Road by Cormac McCarthy, that one was pretty good
@FLanon nice, my copy I bought for a dollar had shit written in it all over so I was kinda angry
traded it somewhere else
yeah that can be distracting
only one book I've read had that kind of stuff and it was a gift from a friend so I tolerated it
Oof
I don't get books from friends since they are brainlets
yeah well brainlets don't exactly read books to begin with unless it's Harry Potter Gets Sodomized By Dumbledore (And that's a good thing!)
oof
but yeah the book he gave me was called "The Screwtape Letters", very good book
Time to beat Wacky Jackie in November <@&414986154224648193>
WACKY
JACKIE
BTFO
Good optics
This is pretty much expected.
That explains the lack of fallout in the polling
That and the fact that it's mostly media outrage
Mueller investigation tier