So

Kavanaugh is not going to be a wild card on that issue, which IMO, is what counts most of all.

1. Kavanaugh
2. Barrett
3. Kethledge.

In order of preference

Well it's what counts for button

Kethledge, as we see here, has a relatively abysmal record on the issue of immigration, and apparently Barrett has some adopted children from Haiti, which could end up causing a sort of conflict of interest when it comes to making a tough ruling on that issue.

Ehh

I'm not sure it would

Hi not sure it would, I'm Dad!

hehe so glad I blocked dadbot

We don't want to take any chances

The adopted children were adopted legally, and thus there should be no issues with cases against illegal immigrants, however this **might** be an issue and so she is not top pick, yet above Kethledge who has a horrible record on immigration as proven by his voting

oops

let me fix that hold on

This is the thing

Immigration of all forms, legal and illegal is an issue.

We must be as hardline as possible when it comes to that issue or we're going to be buried.

So it's very important to have someone strong on it and we know will deliver.

Ok I edited in all I wanted to say

It sent to early first time

Anyways, here's some rulings Kavanaugh had on immigration

Ok

So was my 1 2 3 ordering correct?

on the issue of immigration, yeah

Ok

Overall?

Probably that as well because it's really the main priority

Ok

Kavanaugh denied illegal aliens from being able to vote in union elections (2007)
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/963C33D93AFEE5DF85257440004704D0/$file/06-1329a.pdf

That's good

But that's 11 years ago

Kavanaugh opposed the grant of immigrant visas at expense of American workers (2014)
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/49B2B863D721339885257D78004DF1D6/$file/13-5301-1518126.pdf

That's more recent

And also good

Kavanaugh has recognized the government’s interest in “supporting American farmers and ranchers against their foreign competitors.” (2014)
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/A064A3175BC6DEEE85257D24004FA93B/$file/13-5281-1504951.pdf

So, yeah, on this issue, he's shown a consistent, solid, hardline stance.

Yeah

Other issues?

Guns for example? Since that's more of my area

alright, let me see if he has done a ruling on that issue

Ok